Skip to content
Singulariki

Agricultural Technicians vs Biological Technicians

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Agricultural Technicians and Biological Technicians on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Agricultural Technicians Biological Technicians
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$46,790
$52,000
Employment · BLS OEWS
14,340
76,190
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
42nd pct
27th pct

At a glance

Dimension Agricultural Technicians Biological Technicians
Median pay $46,790 $52,000
Employment 14,340 76,190
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+4.3%) About average (+3.5%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 2,900 9,100
Typical education · O*NET Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not.
AI exposure · published exposure studies Moderate · 42nd pct Low · 27th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 73rd pct · 38% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Augmentation-leaning (55.5%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Biology, Written Comprehension, Chemistry, Reading Comprehension, Written Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Active Listening, Critical Thinking, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Mathematics, Writing, Active Learning, Monitoring, Judgment and Decision Making, Category Flexibility, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Visual Color Discrimination, Speaking, Operations Monitoring, Fluency of Ideas, Mathematical Reasoning, Number Facility, Flexibility of Closure, Perceptual Speed, Selective Attention, Speech Recognition.

Specific to Agricultural Technicians

  • Food Production
  • Mechanical
  • Administration and Management
  • Coordination
  • Instructing
  • Time Management
  • Originality
  • Control Precision

Specific to Biological Technicians

  • English Language
  • Science
  • Speech Clarity
  • Complex Problem Solving
  • Computers and Electronics
  • Systems Analysis
  • Visualization
  • Finger Dexterity

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Data base user interface and query software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Geographic information system , Analytical or scientific software .

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Agricultural Technicians or Biological Technicians — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Agricultural Technicians vs Biological Technicians." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/agricultural-technicians-vs-biological-technicians

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Agricultural Technicians vs Biological Technicians. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/agricultural-technicians-vs-biological-technicians

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-agricultural-technicians-vs-biological-technicians,
  title  = {Agricultural Technicians vs Biological Technicians},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/agricultural-technicians-vs-biological-technicians}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.