Skip to content
Singulariki

Chemists vs Food Scientists and Technologists

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Chemists and Food Scientists and Technologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Chemists Food Scientists and Technologists
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$84,150
$85,310
Employment · BLS OEWS
83,250
14,370
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
77th pct
83rd pct

At a glance

Dimension Chemists Food Scientists and Technologists
Median pay $84,150 $85,310
Employment 83,250 14,370
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+4.9%) About average (+6.5%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 6,300 1,200
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not.
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 77th pct High · 83rd pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 75th pct · 39% of tasks 77th pct · 40% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Augmentation-leaning (61.8%) Augmentation-leaning (50.1%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Chemistry, Science, English Language, Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Speaking, Problem Sensitivity, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility, Near Vision, Mathematics, Active Listening, Writing, Mathematics, Mathematical Reasoning, Active Learning, Complex Problem Solving, Number Facility, Monitoring, Production and Processing, Computers and Electronics, Flexibility of Closure, Quality Control Analysis, Judgment and Decision Making, Speech Recognition, Systems Analysis, Systems Evaluation, Fluency of Ideas, Speech Clarity.

Specific to Chemists

  • Administration and Management
  • Administrative
  • Physics
  • Perceptual Speed
  • Visual Color Discrimination

Specific to Food Scientists and Technologists

  • Food Production
  • Engineering and Technology
  • Originality
  • Biology
  • Social Perceptiveness

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Presentation software , Object or component oriented development software , Web platform development software , Data base user interface and query software , Word processing software , Enterprise resource planning ERP software , Analytical or scientific software .

Specific to Chemists

Specific to Food Scientists and Technologists

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Chemists or Food Scientists and Technologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Chemists vs Food Scientists and Technologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/chemists-vs-food-scientists-and-technologists

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Chemists vs Food Scientists and Technologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/chemists-vs-food-scientists-and-technologists

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-chemists-vs-food-scientists-and-technologists,
  title  = {Chemists vs Food Scientists and Technologists},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/chemists-vs-food-scientists-and-technologists}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.