Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Construction Managers
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians and Construction Managers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians | Construction Managers |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $64,200 | $106,980 |
| Employment | 62,130 | 348,330 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+2.1%) | Growing fast (+8.7%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 5,500 | 46,800 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 68th pct | Moderate · 48th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 52nd pct · 28% of tasks | 48th pct · 26% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (53.0%) | Augmentation-leaning (59.7%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Engineering and Technology, Mathematics, Building and Construction, Design, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Near Vision, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Oral Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Mathematics, Written Expression, Visualization, Administration and Management, Customer and Personal Service, English Language, Mechanical, Speaking, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Writing, Monitoring, Category Flexibility, Complex Problem Solving, Judgment and Decision Making, Public Safety and Security.
Specific to Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Mathematical Reasoning
- Administrative
- Computers and Electronics
- Number Facility
- Far Vision
- Transportation
- Flexibility of Closure
- Physics
Specific to Construction Managers
- Management of Personnel Resources
- Coordination
- Time Management
- Active Learning
- Negotiation
- Production and Processing
- Economics and Accounting
- Personnel and Human Resources
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Enterprise resource planning ERP software , Analytical or scientific software , Graphics or photo imaging software .
Specific to Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Specific to Construction Managers
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians or Construction Managers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Architectural and Civil Drafters
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Construction and Building Inspectors
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Electrical and Electronics Drafters
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Mechanical Drafters
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Transportation Engineers
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Environmental Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Construction Managers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/civil-engineering-technologists-and-technicians-vs-construction-managers
Singulariki. (2026). Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Construction Managers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/civil-engineering-technologists-and-technicians-vs-construction-managers
@misc{singulariki-civil-engineering-technologists-and-technicians-vs-construction-managers,
title = {Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians vs Construction Managers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/civil-engineering-technologists-and-technicians-vs-construction-managers}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.