Skip to content
Singulariki

Cytogenetic Technologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Cytogenetic Technologists and Molecular and Cellular Biologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Cytogenetic Technologists Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Median pay · BLS OEWS
—
$93,330
Employment · BLS OEWS
—
59,710
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
56th pct
77th pct

At a glance

Dimension Cytogenetic Technologists Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Median pay — $93,330
Employment — 59,710
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection — About average (+1.2%)
Annual openings · BLS projection — 4,800
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
AI exposure · published exposure studies Moderate · 56th pct High · 77th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 58th pct · 31% of tasks 77th pct · 40% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — Augmentation-leaning (57.2%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Biology, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Information Ordering, Near Vision, Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, Oral Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Writing, Written Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Active Listening, Speaking, Category Flexibility, Chemistry, Judgment and Decision Making, Flexibility of Closure, Complex Problem Solving, Science, Active Learning, Selective Attention, English Language, Computers and Electronics, Monitoring, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Mathematics, Mathematics, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Fluency of Ideas, Mathematical Reasoning, Number Facility.

Specific to Cytogenetic Technologists

  • Time Management
  • Perceptual Speed
  • Visual Color Discrimination
  • Systems Analysis
  • Arm-Hand Steadiness

Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists

  • Learning Strategies
  • Instructing
  • Originality
  • Education and Training
  • Persuasion

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Graphics or photo imaging software , Object or component oriented development software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Analytical or scientific software , Data base user interface and query software .

Specific to Cytogenetic Technologists

Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Cytogenetic Technologists or Molecular and Cellular Biologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Cytogenetic Technologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/cytogenetic-technologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Cytogenetic Technologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/cytogenetic-technologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-cytogenetic-technologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists,
  title  = {Cytogenetic Technologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/cytogenetic-technologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.