Skip to content
Singulariki

Fence Erectors vs Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Fence Erectors and Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Fence Erectors Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$46,940
$59,280
Employment · BLS OEWS
22,640
14,140
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
14th pct
13th pct

At a glance

Dimension Fence Erectors Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers
Median pay $46,940 $59,280
Employment 22,640 14,140
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+4.6%) About average (+4.6%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 2,300 1,500
Typical education · O*NET Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not. Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
AI exposure · published exposure studies Low · 14th pct Low · 13th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 2nd pct · 9% of tasks 5th pct · 11% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — —
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Building and Construction, Administration and Management, Manual Dexterity, Trunk Strength, Design, Multilimb Coordination, Mathematics, Static Strength, English Language, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Finger Dexterity, Information Ordering, Control Precision, Dynamic Strength, Stamina, Near Vision, Engineering and Technology, Critical Thinking, Monitoring, Coordination, Time Management, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Reaction Time, Extent Flexibility, Depth Perception, Operations Monitoring, Operation and Control.

Specific to Fence Erectors

  • Customer and Personal Service
  • Transportation
  • Education and Training
  • Mechanical
  • Sales and Marketing
  • Production and Processing
  • Public Safety and Security
  • Active Listening

Specific to Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers

  • Category Flexibility
  • Visualization
  • Gross Body Coordination
  • Gross Body Equilibrium
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Inductive Reasoning
  • Flexibility of Closure
  • Far Vision

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Project management software .

Specific to Fence Erectors

Specific to Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Fence Erectors or Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Fence Erectors vs Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/fence-erectors-vs-reinforcing-iron-and-rebar-workers

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Fence Erectors vs Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/fence-erectors-vs-reinforcing-iron-and-rebar-workers

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-fence-erectors-vs-reinforcing-iron-and-rebar-workers,
  title  = {Fence Erectors vs Reinforcing Iron and Rebar Workers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/fence-erectors-vs-reinforcing-iron-and-rebar-workers}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.