Geodetic Surveyors vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Geodetic Surveyors and Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Geodetic Surveyors | Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $72,740 | $99,240 |
| Employment | 53,080 | 22,510 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+4.4%) | About average (+3.2%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 3,900 | 2,000 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 51st pct | Moderate · 61st pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 82nd pct · 44% of tasks | 68th pct · 36% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | — | Augmentation-leaning (59.1%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Mathematics, Mathematics, Reading Comprehension, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Mathematical Reasoning, Flexibility of Closure, Engineering and Technology, Active Listening, Critical Thinking, Deductive Reasoning, Number Facility, Near Vision, Geography, Computers and Electronics, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, English Language, Writing, Judgment and Decision Making, Physics, Problem Sensitivity, Speaking, Active Learning, Monitoring, Education and Training, Science, Systems Analysis, Systems Evaluation, Fluency of Ideas, Speech Clarity, Learning Strategies, Coordination.
Specific to Geodetic Surveyors
- Visualization
- Design
- Customer and Personal Service
Specific to Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers
- Chemistry
- Speech Recognition
- Far Vision
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Data base user interface and query software , Computer aided design CAD software , Object or component oriented development software , Geographic information system , Web platform development software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Map creation software , Analytical or scientific software , Electronic mail software .
Specific to Geodetic Surveyors
Specific to Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Geodetic Surveyors or Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Surveyors
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Cartographers and Photogrammetrists
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Remote Sensing Technicians
- Geodetic Surveyors vs Hydrologists
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Geodetic Surveyors vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/geodetic-surveyors-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers
Singulariki. (2026). Geodetic Surveyors vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/geodetic-surveyors-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers
@misc{singulariki-geodetic-surveyors-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers,
title = {Geodetic Surveyors vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/geodetic-surveyors-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.