Skip to content
Singulariki

Radiologic Technologists and Technicians vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Radiologic Technologists and Technicians and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Radiologic Technologists and Technicians Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$77,660
$88,180
Employment · BLS OEWS
223,460
41,530
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
31st pct
22nd pct

At a glance

Dimension Radiologic Technologists and Technicians Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
Median pay $77,660 $88,180
Employment 223,460 41,530
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+4.3%) Growing fast (+7.1%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 12,900 2,600
Typical education · O*NET Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree.
AI exposure · published exposure studies Low · 31st pct Low · 22nd pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 40th pct · 22% of tasks 40th pct · 22% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — —
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Medicine and Dentistry, Customer and Personal Service, English Language, Oral Comprehension, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Computers and Electronics, Oral Expression, Active Listening, Social Perceptiveness, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Service Orientation, Inductive Reasoning, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Education and Training, Monitoring, Public Safety and Security, Psychology, Critical Thinking, Operation and Control, Physics, Operations Monitoring, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Perceptual Speed, Selective Attention, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Control Precision, Biology, Writing.

Specific to Radiologic Technologists and Technicians

  • Administrative
  • Coordination
  • Visualization
  • Quality Control Analysis
  • Judgment and Decision Making

Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

  • Written Expression
  • Active Learning
  • Complex Problem Solving
  • Manual Dexterity
  • Finger Dexterity

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Medical software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Word processing software .

Specific to Radiologic Technologists and Technicians

Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Radiologic Technologists and Technicians or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Radiologic Technologists and Technicians vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/radiologic-technologists-and-technicians-vs-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Radiologic Technologists and Technicians vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/radiologic-technologists-and-technicians-vs-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-radiologic-technologists-and-technicians-vs-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists,
  title  = {Radiologic Technologists and Technicians vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/radiologic-technologists-and-technicians-vs-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.