Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Machine Feeders and Offbearers
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Recycling and Reclamation Workers and Machine Feeders and Offbearers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Recycling and Reclamation Workers | Machine Feeders and Offbearers |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $38,940 | $39,700 |
| Employment | 2,982,530 | 46,690 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+1.5%) | Declining (-13.0%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 384,300 | 4,700 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not. | Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Low · 12th pct | Low · 3rd pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 6th pct · 12% of tasks | 8th pct · 12% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | — | — |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Production and Processing, Manual Dexterity, Control Precision, Mechanical, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Multilimb Coordination, Near Vision, Public Safety and Security, Education and Training, Operation and Control, Category Flexibility, Finger Dexterity, Trunk Strength, Active Listening, Monitoring, Operations Monitoring, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Information Ordering, Flexibility of Closure, Perceptual Speed, Selective Attention, Rate Control, Reaction Time, English Language, Far Vision, Problem Sensitivity, Static Strength, Speech Recognition, Speaking, Quality Control Analysis.
Specific to Recycling and Reclamation Workers
- Administration and Management
- Customer and Personal Service
- Personnel and Human Resources
- Speed of Limb Movement
- Depth Perception
- Sales and Marketing
- Response Orientation
- Visual Color Discrimination
Specific to Machine Feeders and Offbearers
- Mathematics
- Speech Clarity
- Reading Comprehension
- Troubleshooting
- Written Expression
- Wrist-Finger Speed
- Auditory Attention
- Written Comprehension
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software .
Specific to Recycling and Reclamation Workers
Specific to Machine Feeders and Offbearers
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Recycling and Reclamation Workers or Machine Feeders and Offbearers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Recycling Coordinators
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Hazardous Materials Removal Workers
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Refuse and Recyclable Material Collectors
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Packaging and Filling Machine Operators and Tenders
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Helpers--Extraction Workers
- Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Separating, Filtering, Clarifying, Precipitating, and Still Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Machine Feeders and Offbearers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/recycling-and-reclamation-workers-vs-machine-feeders-and-offbearers
Singulariki. (2026). Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Machine Feeders and Offbearers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/recycling-and-reclamation-workers-vs-machine-feeders-and-offbearers
@misc{singulariki-recycling-and-reclamation-workers-vs-machine-feeders-and-offbearers,
title = {Recycling and Reclamation Workers vs Machine Feeders and Offbearers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/recycling-and-reclamation-workers-vs-machine-feeders-and-offbearers}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.