Skip to content
Singulariki

Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Surveying and Mapping Technicians and Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Surveying and Mapping Technicians Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$51,940
$99,240
Employment · BLS OEWS
56,720
22,510
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
72nd pct
61st pct

At a glance

Dimension Surveying and Mapping Technicians Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers
Median pay $51,940 $99,240
Employment 56,720 22,510
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+4.5%) About average (+3.2%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 7,600 2,000
Typical education · O*NET Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 72nd pct Moderate · 61st pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 52nd pct · 28% of tasks 68th pct · 36% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — Augmentation-leaning (59.1%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman Yes Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Computers and Electronics, Reading Comprehension, Geography, Written Comprehension, Mathematics, English Language, Near Vision, Engineering and Technology, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Inductive Reasoning, Writing, Mathematics, Written Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Active Listening, Speaking, Monitoring, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Far Vision, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Active Learning, Coordination, Fluency of Ideas, Judgment and Decision Making, Mathematical Reasoning.

Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians

  • Design
  • Customer and Personal Service
  • Administrative
  • Social Perceptiveness
  • Persuasion
  • Service Orientation
  • Time Management
  • Perceptual Speed

Specific to Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers

  • Science
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Systems Analysis
  • Systems Evaluation
  • Number Facility
  • Education and Training
  • Learning Strategies

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Geographic information system , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Graphics or photo imaging software , Web platform development software , Data base user interface and query software , Presentation software , Document management software , Word processing software , Object or component oriented development software , Map creation software , Analytical or scientific software .

Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians

Specific to Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Surveying and Mapping Technicians or Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers,
  title  = {Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-geoscientists-except-hydrologists-and-geographers}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.