Surveyors vs Geodetic Surveyors
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Surveyors and Geodetic Surveyors on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Surveyors | Geodetic Surveyors |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $72,740 | $72,740 |
| Employment | 53,080 | 53,080 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+4.4%) | About average (+4.4%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 3,900 | 3,900 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 51st pct | Moderate · 51st pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 82nd pct · 44% of tasks | 82nd pct · 44% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (52.2%) | — |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Mathematics, Engineering and Technology, Geography, Mathematics, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Mathematical Reasoning, Computers and Electronics, Reading Comprehension, Written Expression, Inductive Reasoning, Near Vision, Writing, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Number Facility, Customer and Personal Service, Design, Speaking, Problem Sensitivity, Information Ordering, Speech Clarity, Active Listening, Coordination, English Language, Education and Training, Active Learning, Judgment and Decision Making, Learning Strategies, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure.
Specific to Surveyors
- Building and Construction
- Administration and Management
- Far Vision
- Speech Recognition
- Law and Government
- Time Management
- Perceptual Speed
Specific to Geodetic Surveyors
- Physics
- Monitoring
- Visualization
- Science
- Systems Analysis
- Systems Evaluation
- Fluency of Ideas
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Geographic information system , Word processing software , Map creation software , Analytical or scientific software , Data base user interface and query software .
Specific to Surveyors
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Surveyors or Geodetic Surveyors — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Surveyors vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians
- Surveyors vs Civil Engineers
- Surveyors vs Cartographers and Photogrammetrists
- Surveyors vs Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Surveyors vs Construction and Building Inspectors
- Surveyors vs Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians
- Surveyors vs Mining and Geological Engineers, Including Mining Safety Engineers
- Surveyors vs Architectural and Civil Drafters
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Surveyors vs Geodetic Surveyors." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/surveyors-vs-geodetic-surveyors
Singulariki. (2026). Surveyors vs Geodetic Surveyors. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/surveyors-vs-geodetic-surveyors
@misc{singulariki-surveyors-vs-geodetic-surveyors,
title = {Surveyors vs Geodetic Surveyors},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/surveyors-vs-geodetic-surveyors}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.