Skip to content
Singulariki

Industrial and Production Engineers

ISCO-08 2141 · 2 - Professionals

← The GenAI exposure gradient

On the International Labour Organization's 2025 global study, the 10 task statements that define Industrial and Production Engineers (ISCO-08 2141) score an average of 0.37 on a 0–1 exposure scale — more exposed than about 68% of the 427 placed occupations. Roughly 0% of its tasks fall somewhere on the exposed part of the gradient, and the typical task lands in the Minimal band.

Exposure is task overlap, not a verdict. A high score means a generative-AI model can do part of the content of these tasks — it says nothing about whether the work is automated, whether anyone uses AI for it today, or whether jobs are lost. The gradient is scored on the international ISCO-08 system; the rest of Singulariki is U.S. O*NET/SOC, bridged below by an approximate, many-to-many crosswalk.

0.37
2025 mean exposure (0–1)
68th
percentile across occupations
+0.04
change since 2023
0%
of tasks exposed

How its tasks split across the gradient

Each of the 10 scored tasks for this occupation, sorted into the six exposure bands — cool (human ground) to hot (almost fully assistable).

BandTasksShareWhat it means
Not exposed 0 0% No meaningful GenAI capability on the task
Minimal 10 100% GenAI can touch the edges only
Gradient 1 0 0% Lightly exposed — small assistable slices
Gradient 2 0 0% Partly exposed — real assistable share
Gradient 3 0 0% Heavily exposed — most of the task is assistable
Gradient 4 0 0% Almost fully exposed

The most-exposed task

“Studying functional statements, organizational charts and project information to determine functions and responsibilities of workers and work units and to identify areas of duplication;”

Scores 0.46 on the 2025 scale. The task of studying functional statements, organizational charts, and project information to determine functions and responsibilities of workers and work units and to identify areas of duplication involves significant analysis, pattern recognition, and synthesis of complex organizational details. This is similar to tasks such as "Determining methods of task implementation, making task division for work teams" with an adjusted score of 0.43, which also requires a structured approach but benefits from AI assistance in data processing and analysis. While Generative AI can automate the initial analysis, data processing, and comparison of such documents using pattern recognition and data organization, the need for human oversight persists for interpreting nuanced organizational dynamics and ensuring strategic alignment. Given the potential for AI to manage routine data-driven elements, yet recognizing the requirement for human insight in strategic realignment and context-specific understanding, an adjusted score of 0.475 reflects a balanced view, aligning closely with tasks that blend AI assistance with human strategic decision-making. The assumption of performing this task in a high-income country like Poland, where access to technology is robust, supports the automation potential reflected in this score.

Moving fastest, 2023 → 2025

“Establishing work measurement programmes and analysing work samples to develop standards for labour utilization;”

Model capability on this task changed by +0.24 in two years — the gradient is not static, it is filling in.

U.S. occupations this maps to

The American O*NET/SOC roles that crosswalk to ISCO-08 2141, biggest by employment first, via the published (approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 correspondence. These are the closest U.S. matches — not an asserted one-to-one identity.

In context

Part of the 2 - Professionals major group. Return to the full gradient to see how the whole group sits.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Industrial and Production Engineers sit at the 68th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient

  • Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Industrial and Production Engineers rank in the 68th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient
  • About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
  • Mean task exposure rose by 0.04 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025
  • Its most-exposed task: "Studying functional statements, organizational charts and project information to determine functions and responsibilities of workers and work units and to identify areas of duplication;".ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
Copy the whole kit
Industrial and Production Engineers sit at the 68th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient

• Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Industrial and Production Engineers rank in the 68th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient)
• About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025))
• Mean task exposure rose by 0.04 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025)
• Its most-exposed task: "Studying functional statements, organizational charts and project information to determine functions and responsibilities of workers and work units and to identify areas of duplication;". (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025))

Source: Singulariki — "Industrial and Production Engineers". https://singulariki.com/gradient/2141-industrial-and-production-engineers.html
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Datasets behind this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.