Skip to content
Singulariki

Apiarists and Sericulturists

ISCO-08 6123 · 6 - Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers

← The GenAI exposure gradient

On the International Labour Organization's 2025 global study, the 7 task statements that define Apiarists and Sericulturists (ISCO-08 6123) score an average of 0.22 on a 0–1 exposure scale — more exposed than about 40% of the 427 placed occupations. Roughly 0% of its tasks fall somewhere on the exposed part of the gradient, and the typical task lands in the Not exposed band.

Exposure is task overlap, not a verdict. A high score means a generative-AI model can do part of the content of these tasks — it says nothing about whether the work is automated, whether anyone uses AI for it today, or whether jobs are lost. The gradient is scored on the international ISCO-08 system; the rest of Singulariki is U.S. O*NET/SOC, bridged below by an approximate, many-to-many crosswalk.

0.22
2025 mean exposure (0–1)
40th
percentile across occupations
−0.11
change since 2023
0%
of tasks exposed

How its tasks split across the gradient

Each of the 7 scored tasks for this occupation, sorted into the six exposure bands — cool (human ground) to hot (almost fully assistable).

BandTasksShareWhat it means
Not exposed 7 100% No meaningful GenAI capability on the task
Minimal 0 0% GenAI can touch the edges only
Gradient 1 0 0% Lightly exposed — small assistable slices
Gradient 2 0 0% Partly exposed — real assistable share
Gradient 3 0 0% Heavily exposed — most of the task is assistable
Gradient 4 0 0% Almost fully exposed

The most-exposed task

“Monitoring market activity and conditions, determining kinds and amounts of insect products to produce, and planning and coordinating production accordingly;”

Scores 0.41 on the 2025 scale. The task "Monitoring market activity and conditions, determining kinds and amounts of insect products to produce, and planning and coordinating production accordingly" involves complex decision-making, data analysis, and strategic planning, areas where Generative AI can assist significantly but not entirely replace human expertise. The tasks with similar cognitive demands, such as "Determining the amount of required seeds, fertilizers", "Creating short-, medium-, and long-term plans" and "Planning and controlling the use of resources and assets", have scores ranging from 0.38 to 0.44, reflecting moderate automation potential due to AI's strengths in data analysis and forecasting. Given these tasks necessarily involve human oversight and domain-specific expertise, as well as the context of Poland's high-tech infrastructure which facilitates AI integration, an adjusted score of 0.38 acknowledges AI's valuable role in supporting this complex blend of analytical and strategic functions, while recognizing the necessity for human insight and decision-making for execution and adjustments based on nuanced market realities.

Moving fastest, 2023 → 2025

“Training and supervising workers in production procedures, maintenance duties, and health and safety precautions, and hiring and discharging workers and contractors.”

Model capability on this task changed by +0.04 in two years — the gradient is not static, it is filling in.

U.S. occupations this maps to

The American O*NET/SOC roles that crosswalk to ISCO-08 6123, biggest by employment first, via the published (approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 correspondence. These are the closest U.S. matches — not an asserted one-to-one identity.

In context

Part of the 6 - Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers major group. Return to the full gradient to see how the whole group sits.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Apiarists and Sericulturists sit at the 40th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient

  • Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Apiarists and Sericulturists rank in the 40th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient
  • About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
  • Mean task exposure fell by 0.11 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025
  • Its most-exposed task: "Monitoring market activity and conditions, determining kinds and amounts of insect products to produce, and planning and coordinating production accordingly;".ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
Copy the whole kit
Apiarists and Sericulturists sit at the 40th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient

• Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Apiarists and Sericulturists rank in the 40th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient)
• About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025))
• Mean task exposure fell by 0.11 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025)
• Its most-exposed task: "Monitoring market activity and conditions, determining kinds and amounts of insect products to produce, and planning and coordinating production accordingly;". (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025))

Source: Singulariki — "Apiarists and Sericulturists". https://singulariki.com/gradient/6123-apiarists-and-sericulturists.html
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Datasets behind this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.