Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders
ISCO-08 7515 · 7 - Craft and related trades workers
On the International Labour Organization's 2025 global study, the 5 task statements that define Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders (ISCO-08 7515) score an average of 0.31 on a 0–1 exposure scale — more exposed than about 57% of the 427 placed occupations. Roughly 0% of its tasks fall somewhere on the exposed part of the gradient, and the typical task lands in the Minimal band.
Exposure is task overlap, not a verdict. A high score means a generative-AI model can do part of the content of these tasks — it says nothing about whether the work is automated, whether anyone uses AI for it today, or whether jobs are lost. The gradient is scored on the international ISCO-08 system; the rest of Singulariki is U.S. O*NET/SOC, bridged below by an approximate, many-to-many crosswalk.
How its tasks split across the gradient
Each of the 5 scored tasks for this occupation, sorted into the six exposure bands — cool (human ground) to hot (almost fully assistable).
| Band | Tasks | Share | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not exposed | 0 | 0% | No meaningful GenAI capability on the task |
| Minimal | 5 | 100% | GenAI can touch the edges only |
| Gradient 1 | 0 | 0% | Lightly exposed — small assistable slices |
| Gradient 2 | 0 | 0% | Partly exposed — real assistable share |
| Gradient 3 | 0 | 0% | Heavily exposed — most of the task is assistable |
| Gradient 4 | 0 | 0% | Almost fully exposed |
The most-exposed task
“Recording the grade and/or identification numbers on tags, receiving, or sales sheets;”
Scores 0.55 on the 2025 scale. The task of recording grades and/or identification numbers on tags, receiving, or sales sheets involves routine data entry, which Generative AI can assist with by automating data processing, standardizing formats, and reducing human workload in repetitive tasks. In the context provided, related tasks such as "Preparing sales registers" and "Issuing sales invoices" had adjusted scores of 0.65 and 0.68, highlighting the high automation potential in structured data manipulation and entry tasks. However, unlike these documented processes, accurately recording grades and identification numbers may involve more manual verification and the need for precision in physical handling or interpreting confusing or illegible handwriting. More akin to tasks like "Collecting payments for sold products" or "Adhering to packaging standards," which have scores of 0.375 and 0.35 respectively, this task likely requires a combination of human oversight and automated assistance to ensure accuracy and compliance, particularly in handling edge cases or unusual entries. Therefore, in a high-income country like Poland, where access to automation-supporting technology is prevalent, a balanced adjusted score of 0.42 reflects both the high potential for standardized automation and the necessary human intervention.
Moving fastest, 2023 → 2025
“Determining quality, acceptability to consumer tastes and approximate value of products, and grading them into appropriate classes;”
Model capability on this task changed by +0.07 in two years — the gradient is not static, it is filling in.
U.S. occupations this maps to
The American O*NET/SOC roles that crosswalk to ISCO-08 7515, biggest by employment first, via the published (approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 correspondence. These are the closest U.S. matches — not an asserted one-to-one identity.
In context
Part of the 7 - Craft and related trades workers major group. Return to the full gradient to see how the whole group sits.
Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation
Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders sit at the 57th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient
- Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders rank in the 57th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient
- About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
- Mean task exposure rose by 0.02 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025
- Its most-exposed task: "Recording the grade and/or identification numbers on tags, receiving, or sales sheets;".ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders sit at the 57th percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient • Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders rank in the 57th percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient) • About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)) • Mean task exposure rose by 0.02 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025) • Its most-exposed task: "Recording the grade and/or identification numbers on tags, receiving, or sales sheets;". (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)) Source: Singulariki — "Food and Beverage Tasters and Graders". https://singulariki.com/gradient/7515-food-and-beverage-tasters-and-graders.html Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Datasets behind this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)