Assess eligibility of potential subjects through methods such as screening interviews, reviews of medical records, or discussions with physicians and nurses.

“Assess eligibility of potential subjects through methods such as screening interviews, reviews of medical records, or discussions with physicians and nurses.” is a core task performed by Clinical Research Coordinators. Among the occupation's 33 rated tasks, workers place it 31st by importance (#3 most important). About 90% of workers say it is relevant to their job.

This is a single occupation-specific task statement from O*NET. The figures below describe how central the task is to the job and what independent studies measure about AI and this kind of work — not a prediction that the task will be automated.

Work activities this task rolls up to

O*NET groups concrete tasks into broader work activities shared across many occupations.

• Interview people to obtain information. in Getting Information

AI exposure

The OpenAI / Eloundou “GPTs are GPTs” study rates this task E2. Exposure with tools — software built on top of a language model (not the model alone) could cut the time by at least half.

Exposure measures whether a model could meaningfully speed the task up — it is an estimate of overlap with model capabilities, not a measure of whether the work will be done by software. The study's intermediate score (β) for this task is 0.50. Automation potential label: T2.

Other tasks in this occupation

• Schedule subjects for appointments, procedures, or inpatient stays as required by study protocols. · importance 4.5
• Perform specific protocol procedures such as interviewing subjects, taking vital signs, and performing electrocardiograms. · importance 4.4
• Prepare study-related documentation, such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, or progress reports. · importance 4.4
• Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. · importance 4.4
• Record adverse event and side effect data and confer with investigators regarding the reporting of events to oversight agencies. · importance 4.3
• Monitor study activities to ensure compliance with protocols and with all relevant local, federal, and state regulatory and institutional polices. · importance 4.3
• Oversee subject enrollment to ensure that informed consent is properly obtained and documented. · importance 4.3
• Maintain required records of study activity including case report forms, drug dispensation records, or regulatory forms. · importance 4.3
• Dispense medical devices or drugs, and calculate dosages and provide instructions as necessary. · importance 4.3
• Identify protocol problems, inform investigators of problems, or assist in problem resolution efforts, such as protocol revisions. · importance 4.3
• Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, or potential subject risks. · importance 4.2
• Collaborate with investigators to prepare presentations or reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions. · importance 4.1
• Track enrollment status of subjects and document dropout information such as dropout causes and subject contact efforts. · importance 4.1
• Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. · importance 4.1

See all tasks on the Clinical Research Coordinators page.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

• O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
• “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

@misc{singulariki-task-15610,
  title  = {Assess eligibility of potential subjects through methods such as screening interviews, reviews of medical records, or discussions with physicians and nurses.},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-15610}
}