Advise project teams on subjects such as premarket regulatory requirements, export and labeling requirements, or clinical study compliance issues.

“Advise project teams on subjects such as premarket regulatory requirements, export and labeling requirements, or clinical study compliance issues.” is a core task performed by Regulatory Affairs Specialists. Among the occupation's 32 rated tasks, workers place it 24th by importance (#9 most important). About 100% of workers say it is relevant to their job.

This is a single occupation-specific task statement from O*NET. The figures below describe how central the task is to the job and what independent studies measure about AI and this kind of work — not a prediction that the task will be automated.

Work activities this task rolls up to

O*NET groups concrete tasks into broader work activities shared across many occupations.

• Advise others on legal or regulatory matters. in Providing Consultation and Advice to Others

AI exposure

The OpenAI / Eloundou “GPTs are GPTs” study rates this task E2. Exposure with tools — software built on top of a language model (not the model alone) could cut the time by at least half.

Exposure measures whether a model could meaningfully speed the task up — it is an estimate of overlap with model capabilities, not a measure of whether the work will be done by software. The study's intermediate score (β) for this task is 0.50. Automation potential label: T2.

How AI is actually used on this kind of task

The Anthropic Economic Index observes how people actually use AI on tasks like this one across millions of real conversations.

• 0.007% share of AI-use records mapped to this task
• 81% of that use is work-related
• 96% of interactions still needed a human in the loop

Observed AI use describes people choosing to use AI as a tool on this kind of task today. It is augmentation and assistance, not a measure of jobs replaced.

Working with AI vs. handing it off

Of the AI conversations mapped to this task, the split between people working alongside AI and people delegating the task to it.

How people interact with AI on this task

Other tasks in this occupation

• Coordinate efforts associated with the preparation of regulatory documents or submissions. · importance 4.6
• Communicate with regulatory agencies regarding pre-submission strategies, potential regulatory pathways, compliance test requirements, or clarification and follow-up of submissions under review. · importance 4.5
• Prepare or direct the preparation of additional information or responses as requested by regulatory agencies. · importance 4.5
• Coordinate, prepare, or review regulatory submissions for domestic or international projects. · importance 4.5
• Prepare or maintain technical files as necessary to obtain and sustain product approval. · importance 4.5
• Interpret regulatory rules or rule changes and ensure that they are communicated through corporate policies and procedures. · importance 4.4
• Determine the types of regulatory submissions or internal documentation that are required in situations such as proposed device changes or labeling changes. · importance 4.4
• Coordinate recall or market withdrawal activities as necessary. · importance 4.4
• Review adverse drug reactions and file all related reports in accordance with regulatory agency guidelines. · importance 4.3
• Review product promotional materials, labeling, batch records, specification sheets, or test methods for compliance with applicable regulations and policies. · importance 4.3
• Identify relevant guidance documents, international standards, or consensus standards. · importance 4.3
• Provide technical review of data or reports to be incorporated into regulatory submissions to assure scientific rigor, accuracy, and clarity of presentation. · importance 4.2
• Maintain current knowledge base of existing and emerging regulations, standards, or guidance documents. · importance 4.0
• Review clinical protocols to ensure collection of data needed for regulatory submissions. · importance 4.0

See all tasks on the Regulatory Affairs Specialists page.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

• O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
• Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
• “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

@misc{singulariki-task-18052,
  title  = {Advise project teams on subjects such as premarket regulatory requirements, export and labeling requirements, or clinical study compliance issues.},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-18052}
}