Research case law or outcomes of previous case hearings.

“Research case law or outcomes of previous case hearings.” is a core task performed by Labor Relations Specialists. Among the occupation's 28 rated tasks, workers place it 13th by importance (#16 most important). About 100% of workers say it is relevant to their job.

This is a single occupation-specific task statement from O*NET. The figures below describe how central the task is to the job and what independent studies measure about AI and this kind of work — not a prediction that the task will be automated.

Work activities this task rolls up to

O*NET groups concrete tasks into broader work activities shared across many occupations.

• Maintain current knowledge in area of expertise. in Updating and Using Relevant Knowledge

AI exposure

The OpenAI / Eloundou “GPTs are GPTs” study rates this task E2. Exposure with tools — software built on top of a language model (not the model alone) could cut the time by at least half.

Exposure measures whether a model could meaningfully speed the task up — it is an estimate of overlap with model capabilities, not a measure of whether the work will be done by software. The study's intermediate score (β) for this task is 0.50. Automation potential label: T3.

How AI is actually used on this kind of task

The Anthropic Economic Index observes how people actually use AI on tasks like this one across millions of real conversations.

• 0.002% share of AI-use records mapped to this task

Observed AI use describes people choosing to use AI as a tool on this kind of task today. It is augmentation and assistance, not a measure of jobs replaced.

Other tasks in this occupation

• Negotiate collective bargaining agreements. · importance 4.7
• Investigate and evaluate union complaints or arguments to determine viability. · importance 4.4
• Propose resolutions for collective bargaining or other labor or contract negotiations. · importance 4.2
• Draft contract proposals or counter-proposals for collective bargaining or other labor negotiations. · importance 4.1
• Interpret contractual agreements for employers and employees engaged in collective bargaining or other labor relations processes. · importance 4.1
• Mediate discussions between employer and employee representatives in attempt to reconcile differences. · importance 4.1
• Prepare evidence for disciplinary hearings, including preparing witnesses to testify. · importance 4.1
• Review employer practices or employee data to ensure compliance with contracts on matters such as wages, hours, or conditions of employment. · importance 4.0
• Monitor company or workforce adherence to labor agreements. · importance 4.0
• Recommend collective bargaining strategies, goals, or objectives. · importance 4.0
• Call or meet with union, company, government, or other interested parties to discuss labor relations matters, such as contract negotiations or grievances. · importance 3.9
• Assess risk levels associated with collective bargaining strategies. · importance 3.8
• Present the position of the company or of labor during arbitration or other labor negotiations. · importance 3.6
• Draft rules or regulations to govern collective bargaining activities in collaboration with company, government, or employee representatives. · importance 3.6

See all tasks on the Labor Relations Specialists page.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

• O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
• Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
• “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

@misc{singulariki-task-18902,
  title  = {Research case law or outcomes of previous case hearings.},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-18902}
}