Review dockets of pending litigation to ensure adequate progress.

“Review dockets of pending litigation to ensure adequate progress.” is a core task performed by Judicial Law Clerks. Among the occupation's 19 rated tasks, workers place it 10th by importance (#10 most important). About 86% of workers say it is relevant to their job.

This is a single occupation-specific task statement from O*NET. The figures below describe how central the task is to the job and what independent studies measure about AI and this kind of work — not a prediction that the task will be automated.

Work activities this task rolls up to

O*NET groups concrete tasks into broader work activities shared across many occupations.

• Consult legal materials or public records. in Getting Information
• Examine materials or documentation for accuracy or compliance. in Evaluating Information to Determine Compliance with Standards

AI exposure

The OpenAI / Eloundou “GPTs are GPTs” study rates this task E2. Exposure with tools — software built on top of a language model (not the model alone) could cut the time by at least half.

Exposure measures whether a model could meaningfully speed the task up — it is an estimate of overlap with model capabilities, not a measure of whether the work will be done by software. The study's intermediate score (β) for this task is 0.50. Automation potential label: T3.

Other tasks in this occupation

• Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations. · importance 4.8
• Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court. · importance 4.8
• Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations. · importance 4.8
• Confer with judges concerning legal questions, construction of documents, or granting of orders. · importance 4.6
• Review complaints, petitions, motions, or pleadings that have been filed to determine issues involved or basis for relief. · importance 4.6
• Keep abreast of changes in the law and inform judges when cases are affected by such changes. · importance 4.1
• Attend court sessions to hear oral arguments or record necessary case information. · importance 4.0
• Enter information into computerized court calendar, filing, or case management systems. · importance 3.6
• Verify that all files, complaints, or other papers are available and in the proper order. · importance 3.5
• Communicate with counsel regarding case management or procedural requirements. · importance 3.4
• Respond to questions from judicial officers or court staff on general legal issues. · importance 3.3
• Coordinate judges' meeting and appointment schedules. · importance 3.1
• Participate in conferences or discussions between trial attorneys and judges. · importance 2.8
• Prepare periodic reports on court proceedings, as required. · importance 2.7

See all tasks on the Judicial Law Clerks page.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

• O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
• “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

@misc{singulariki-task-19053,
  title  = {Review dockets of pending litigation to ensure adequate progress.},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-19053}
}