Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.
Work task
“Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.” is a core task performed by Financial Examiners. Among the occupation's 17 rated tasks, workers place it 6th by importance (#12 most important). About 100% of workers say it is relevant to their job.
This is a single occupation-specific task statement from O*NET. The figures below describe how central the task is to the job and what independent studies measure about AI and this kind of work — not a prediction that the task will be automated.
Work activities this task rolls up to
O*NET groups concrete tasks into broader work activities shared across many occupations.
AI exposure
The OpenAI / Eloundou “GPTs are GPTs” study rates this task E2. Exposure with tools — software built on top of a language model (not the model alone) could cut the time by at least half.
Exposure measures whether a model could meaningfully speed the task up — it is an estimate of overlap with model capabilities, not a measure of whether the work will be done by software. The study's intermediate score (β) for this task is 0.50. Automation potential label: T2.
How AI is actually used on this kind of task
The Anthropic Economic Index observes how people actually use AI on tasks like this one across millions of real conversations.
- 0.045% share of AI-use records mapped to this task
- 45% of that use is work-related
- Most common interaction: learning
- Average autonomy of the AI: 3.1 (1–5; higher = more autonomous)
- 96% of interactions still needed a human in the loop
Observed AI use describes people choosing to use AI as a tool on this kind of task today. It is augmentation and assistance, not a measure of jobs replaced.
Working with AI vs. handing it off
Of the AI conversations mapped to this task, the split between people working alongside AI and people delegating the task to it.
How people interact with AI on this task
| Interaction pattern | Share | % | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| learning | 38% | you ask AI to explain or teach you | |
| directive | 26% | you give the instruction; AI produces a finished result | |
| task iteration | 22% | you and AI go back and forth on the work | |
| validation | 12% | you do the work; AI checks it |
Other tasks in this occupation
- Direct and participate in formal and informal meetings with bank directors, trustees, senior management, counsels, outside accountants, and consultants to gather information and discuss findings. · importance 4.7
- Recommend actions to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, or to protect solvency of institutions. · importance 4.7
- Prepare reports, exhibits, and other supporting schedules that detail an institution's safety and soundness, compliance with laws and regulations, and recommended solutions to questionable financial conditions. · importance 4.5
- Resolve problems concerning the overall financial integrity of banking institutions including loan investment portfolios, capital, earnings, and specific or large troubled accounts. · importance 4.2
- Investigate activities of institutions to enforce laws and regulations and to ensure legality of transactions and operations or financial solvency. · importance 4.2
- Plan, supervise, and review work of assigned subordinates. · importance 4.1
- Review balance sheets, operating income and expense accounts, and loan documentation to confirm institution assets and liabilities. · importance 4.1
- Review audit reports of internal and external auditors to monitor adequacy of scope of reports or to discover specific weaknesses in internal routines. · importance 4.0
- Examine the minutes of meetings of directors, stockholders, and committees to investigate the specific authority extended at various levels of management. · importance 4.0
- Train other examiners in the financial examination process. · importance 3.8
- Establish guidelines for procedures and policies that comply with new and revised regulations and direct their implementation. · importance 3.8
- Provide regulatory compliance training to employees. · importance 3.6
- Review applications for mergers, acquisitions, establishment of new institutions, acceptance in Federal Reserve System, or registration of securities sales to determine their public interest value and conformance to regulations, and recommend acceptance or rejection. · importance 3.5
- Evaluate data processing applications for institutions under examination to develop recommendations for coordinating existing systems with examination procedures. · importance 3.5
See all tasks on the Financial Examiners page.
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-7315
Singulariki. (2026). Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-7315
@misc{singulariki-task-7315,
title = {Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/tasks/task-7315}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.