Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Materials Engineers
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Commercial and Industrial Designers and Materials Engineers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Commercial and Industrial Designers | Materials Engineers |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $79,450 | $108,310 |
| Employment | 30,250 | 22,770 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+3.2%) | About average (+5.7%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 2,500 | 1,500 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 70th pct | Moderate · 62nd pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 65th pct · 35% of tasks | 56th pct · 30% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (43.8%) | — |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Design, Engineering and Technology, Production and Processing, Active Listening, Computers and Electronics, Reading Comprehension, Fluency of Ideas, Originality, Near Vision, Critical Thinking, Complex Problem Solving, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Oral Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Visualization, Mathematics, Problem Sensitivity, Information Ordering, Speech Recognition, English Language, Speaking, Speech Clarity, Inductive Reasoning, Operations Analysis, Judgment and Decision Making, Writing, Monitoring, Written Expression, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Physics.
Specific to Commercial and Industrial Designers
- Mechanical
- Time Management
- Visual Color Discrimination
- Social Perceptiveness
- Coordination
- Persuasion
- Technology Design
- Selective Attention
Specific to Materials Engineers
- Chemistry
- Science
- Mathematical Reasoning
- Active Learning
- Perceptual Speed
- Instructing
- Service Orientation
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Graphics or photo imaging software , Computer aided design CAD software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Presentation software , Document management software , Development environment software , Object or component oriented development software , Data base user interface and query software , Word processing software , Enterprise resource planning ERP software , Analytical or scientific software , Computer aided manufacturing CAM software .
Specific to Commercial and Industrial Designers
Specific to Materials Engineers
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Commercial and Industrial Designers or Materials Engineers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Mechanical Drafters
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Model Makers, Metal and Plastic
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Fabric and Apparel Patternmakers
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Patternmakers, Metal and Plastic
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Fashion Designers
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Industrial Engineers
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Layout Workers, Metal and Plastic
- Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Materials Engineers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/commercial-and-industrial-designers-vs-materials-engineers
Singulariki. (2026). Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Materials Engineers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/commercial-and-industrial-designers-vs-materials-engineers
@misc{singulariki-commercial-and-industrial-designers-vs-materials-engineers,
title = {Commercial and Industrial Designers vs Materials Engineers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/commercial-and-industrial-designers-vs-materials-engineers}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.