Skip to content
Singulariki

Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians and Surveying and Mapping Technicians on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians Surveying and Mapping Technicians
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$108,970
$51,940
Employment · BLS OEWS
439,380
56,720
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
88th pct
72nd pct

At a glance

Dimension Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians Surveying and Mapping Technicians
Median pay $108,970 $51,940
Employment 439,380 56,720
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection Growing fast (+8.2%) About average (+4.5%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 31,300 7,600
Typical education · O*NET Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree.
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 88th pct High · 72nd pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk — 52nd pct · 28% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — —
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman — Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Geography, Computers and Electronics, English Language, Reading Comprehension, Mathematics, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Critical Thinking, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Near Vision, Active Listening, Speaking, Oral Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Design, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Complex Problem Solving, Judgment and Decision Making, Written Expression, Category Flexibility, Customer and Personal Service, Writing, Mathematical Reasoning, Engineering and Technology, Mathematics, Active Learning, Monitoring, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Flexibility of Closure, Time Management.

Specific to Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians

  • Visualization
  • Selective Attention
  • Education and Training
  • Number Facility
  • Programming
  • Administration and Management

Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians

  • Far Vision
  • Fluency of Ideas
  • Administrative
  • Persuasion
  • Service Orientation
  • Perceptual Speed

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Data base user interface and query software , Computer aided design CAD software , Geographic information system , Web platform development software , Development environment software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Object or component oriented development software , Document management software , Graphics or photo imaging software .

Specific to Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians

Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians or Surveying and Mapping Technicians — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/geographic-information-systems-technologists-and-technicians-vs-surveying-and-mapping-technicians

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/geographic-information-systems-technologists-and-technicians-vs-surveying-and-mapping-technicians

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-geographic-information-systems-technologists-and-technicians-vs-surveying-and-mapping-technicians,
  title  = {Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians vs Surveying and Mapping Technicians},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/geographic-information-systems-technologists-and-technicians-vs-surveying-and-mapping-technicians}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.