Library Assistants, Clerical vs Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Library Assistants, Clerical and Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Library Assistants, Clerical | Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $36,010 | $78,630 |
| Employment | 80,070 | 4,100 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | Declining (-6.7%) | About average (+3.0%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 12,800 | 400 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not. | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 51st pct | High · 96th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 84th pct · 46% of tasks | 70th pct · 37% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Automation-leaning (52.4%) | Augmentation-leaning (66.2%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Customer and Personal Service, Written Comprehension, Oral Expression, English Language, Service Orientation, Oral Comprehension, Information Ordering, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Near Vision, Problem Sensitivity, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Education and Training, Writing, Speaking, Critical Thinking, Coordination, Written Expression, Category Flexibility, Psychology, Computers and Electronics, Monitoring, Social Perceptiveness, Complex Problem Solving, Time Management, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Instructing, Judgment and Decision Making, Learning Strategies.
Specific to Library Assistants, Clerical
- Administrative
- Perceptual Speed
- Selective Attention
- Public Safety and Security
- Time Sharing
- Flexibility of Closure
- Trunk Strength
- Far Vision
Specific to Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary
- Active Learning
- Communications and Media
- Sociology and Anthropology
- Administration and Management
- Systems Analysis
- Systems Evaluation
- Mathematics
- Law and Government
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Document management software , Object or component oriented development software , Data base user interface and query software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Library software , Information retrieval or search software .
Specific to Library Assistants, Clerical
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Library Assistants, Clerical or Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Library Technicians
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs File Clerks
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Office Clerks, General
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Secretaries and Administrative Assistants, Except Legal, Medical, and Executive
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Document Management Specialists
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Stockers and Order Fillers
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Receptionists and Information Clerks
- Library Assistants, Clerical vs Office Machine Operators, Except Computer
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Library Assistants, Clerical vs Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/library-assistants-clerical-vs-library-science-teachers-postsecondary
Singulariki. (2026). Library Assistants, Clerical vs Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/library-assistants-clerical-vs-library-science-teachers-postsecondary
@misc{singulariki-library-assistants-clerical-vs-library-science-teachers-postsecondary,
title = {Library Assistants, Clerical vs Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/library-assistants-clerical-vs-library-science-teachers-postsecondary}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.