Skip to content
Singulariki

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists and Diagnostic Medical Sonographers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists Diagnostic Medical Sonographers
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$88,180
$89,340
Employment · BLS OEWS
41,530
86,460
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
22nd pct
20th pct

At a glance

Dimension Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists Diagnostic Medical Sonographers
Median pay $88,180 $89,340
Employment 41,530 86,460
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection Growing fast (+7.1%) Growing fast (+13.0%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 2,600 5,800
Typical education · O*NET Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree.
AI exposure · published exposure studies Low · 22nd pct Low · 20th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 40th pct · 22% of tasks 40th pct · 22% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index — —
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No No

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Customer and Personal Service, English Language, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Near Vision, Physics, Reading Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Active Listening, Monitoring, Computers and Electronics, Speaking, Operations Monitoring, Problem Sensitivity, Medicine and Dentistry, Written Expression, Education and Training, Critical Thinking, Operation and Control, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Control Precision, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Writing, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Service Orientation, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Psychology.

Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

  • Public Safety and Security
  • Perceptual Speed
  • Selective Attention
  • Manual Dexterity
  • Finger Dexterity
  • Biology

Specific to Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

  • Time Management
  • Administrative
  • Science
  • Coordination
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Learning Strategies

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Medical software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software .

Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Specific to Diagnostic Medical Sonographers

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists or Diagnostic Medical Sonographers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Diagnostic Medical Sonographers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-diagnostic-medical-sonographers

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Diagnostic Medical Sonographers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-diagnostic-medical-sonographers

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-diagnostic-medical-sonographers,
  title  = {Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Diagnostic Medical Sonographers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-diagnostic-medical-sonographers}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.