Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists and Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists | Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $88,180 | — |
| Employment | 41,530 | — |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | Growing fast (+7.1%) | — |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 2,600 | — |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Low · 22nd pct | Moderate · 45th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 40th pct · 22% of tasks | 58th pct · 31% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | — | Automation-leaning (49.1%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Customer and Personal Service, English Language, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Near Vision, Reading Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Active Listening, Monitoring, Speaking, Operations Monitoring, Problem Sensitivity, Medicine and Dentistry, Public Safety and Security, Written Expression, Critical Thinking, Deductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Control Precision, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Writing, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Selective Attention, Arm-Hand Steadiness, Manual Dexterity, Finger Dexterity, Biology.
Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
- Physics
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Training
- Operation and Control
- Inductive Reasoning
- Service Orientation
- Perceptual Speed
- Psychology
Specific to Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians
- Chemistry
- Mathematics
- Administrative
- Science
- Instructing
- Quality Control Analysis
- Time Management
- Visual Color Discrimination
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Medical software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Word processing software .
Specific to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
Specific to Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists or Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Radiologic Technologists and Technicians
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Diagnostic Medical Sonographers
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Nuclear Medicine Technologists
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Neurodiagnostic Technologists
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Radiation Therapists
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Ophthalmic Medical Technologists
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-medical-and-clinical-laboratory-technicians
Singulariki. (2026). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-medical-and-clinical-laboratory-technicians
@misc{singulariki-magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-medical-and-clinical-laboratory-technicians,
title = {Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technicians},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-technologists-vs-medical-and-clinical-laboratory-technicians}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.