Natural Sciences Managers vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Natural Sciences Managers and Molecular and Cellular Biologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Natural Sciences Managers | Molecular and Cellular Biologists |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $161,180 | $93,330 |
| Employment | 100,870 | 59,710 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+3.7%) | About average (+1.2%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 8,500 | 4,800 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 34th pct | High · 77th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 77th pct · 40% of tasks | 77th pct · 40% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (49.1%) | Augmentation-leaning (57.2%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Science, Written Comprehension, Biology, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Critical Thinking, Monitoring, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, English Language, Writing, Speaking, Complex Problem Solving, Problem Sensitivity, Category Flexibility, Speech Clarity, Judgment and Decision Making, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Computers and Electronics, Active Learning, Learning Strategies, Chemistry, Mathematics, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Originality, Persuasion, Instructing, Fluency of Ideas.
Specific to Natural Sciences Managers
- Administration and Management
- Management of Personnel Resources
- Administrative
- Personnel and Human Resources
- Operations Analysis
- Systems Analysis
Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists
- Mathematical Reasoning
- Education and Training
- Number Facility
- Flexibility of Closure
- Selective Attention
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Presentation software , Graphics or photo imaging software , Analytical or scientific software , Data base user interface and query software , Word processing software , Object or component oriented development software .
Specific to Natural Sciences Managers
Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Natural Sciences Managers or Molecular and Cellular Biologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Project Management Specialists
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Data Scientists
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Biological Technicians
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Biologists
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Clinical Research Coordinators
- Natural Sciences Managers vs Bioinformatics Scientists
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Natural Sciences Managers vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/natural-sciences-managers-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists
Singulariki. (2026). Natural Sciences Managers vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/natural-sciences-managers-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists
@misc{singulariki-natural-sciences-managers-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists,
title = {Natural Sciences Managers vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/natural-sciences-managers-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.