Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Physics Teachers, Postsecondary and Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Physics Teachers, Postsecondary | Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $97,360 | $106,120 |
| Employment | 13,590 | 39,910 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+2.5%) | Growing fast (+8.1%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 1,300 | 4,100 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 89th pct | High · 95th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 70th pct · 37% of tasks | 70th pct · 37% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (65.9%) | Augmentation-leaning (67.0%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Mathematics, Physics, Education and Training, Oral Expression, Instructing, English Language, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Science, Active Listening, Writing, Critical Thinking, Active Learning, Learning Strategies, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Written Expression, Computers and Electronics, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Mathematical Reasoning, Speech Clarity, Judgment and Decision Making, Mathematics, Monitoring, Complex Problem Solving, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Chemistry, Number Facility, Engineering and Technology, Fluency of Ideas, Coordination, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility.
Specific to Physics Teachers, Postsecondary
- Time Management
- Social Perceptiveness
- Persuasion
- Service Orientation
Specific to Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
- Design
- Mechanical
- Originality
- Administration and Management
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Object or component oriented development software , Word processing software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Analytical or scientific software , Computer based training software , Information retrieval or search software , Optical character reader OCR or scanning software .
Specific to Physics Teachers, Postsecondary
Specific to Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Physics Teachers, Postsecondary or Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Physicists
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Teaching Assistants, Postsecondary
- Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Computer Science Teachers, Postsecondary
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary
Singulariki. (2026). Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary
@misc{singulariki-physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary,
title = {Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.