Skip to content
Singulariki

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Physics Teachers, Postsecondary and Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$97,360
$106,120
Employment · BLS OEWS
13,590
39,910
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
89th pct
95th pct

At a glance

Dimension Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
Median pay $97,360 $106,120
Employment 13,590 39,910
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+2.5%) Growing fast (+8.1%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 1,300 4,100
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 89th pct High · 95th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 70th pct · 37% of tasks 70th pct · 37% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Augmentation-leaning (65.9%) Augmentation-leaning (67.0%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman Yes Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Mathematics, Physics, Education and Training, Oral Expression, Instructing, English Language, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Science, Active Listening, Writing, Critical Thinking, Active Learning, Learning Strategies, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Written Expression, Computers and Electronics, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Mathematical Reasoning, Speech Clarity, Judgment and Decision Making, Mathematics, Monitoring, Complex Problem Solving, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Chemistry, Number Facility, Engineering and Technology, Fluency of Ideas, Coordination, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility.

Specific to Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

  • Time Management
  • Social Perceptiveness
  • Persuasion
  • Service Orientation

Specific to Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

  • Design
  • Mechanical
  • Originality
  • Administration and Management

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Object or component oriented development software , Word processing software , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Analytical or scientific software , Computer based training software , Information retrieval or search software , Optical character reader OCR or scanning software .

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Physics Teachers, Postsecondary or Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary,
  title  = {Physics Teachers, Postsecondary vs Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/physics-teachers-postsecondary-vs-engineering-teachers-postsecondary}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.