Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Surveying and Mapping Technicians and Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Surveying and Mapping Technicians | Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $51,940 | $117,960 |
| Employment | 56,720 | 22,580 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+4.5%) | About average (+0.6%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 7,600 | 2,000 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 72nd pct | Moderate · 59th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 52nd pct · 28% of tasks | 78th pct · 41% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | — | Automation-leaning (63.5%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Computers and Electronics, Reading Comprehension, Geography, Written Comprehension, Mathematics, English Language, Near Vision, Engineering and Technology, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Inductive Reasoning, Design, Writing, Mathematics, Written Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Active Listening, Speaking, Monitoring, Complex Problem Solving, Category Flexibility, Flexibility of Closure, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Active Learning, Fluency of Ideas, Judgment and Decision Making, Mathematical Reasoning.
Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians
- Customer and Personal Service
- Far Vision
- Coordination
- Administrative
- Social Perceptiveness
- Persuasion
- Service Orientation
- Time Management
Specific to Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists
- Science
- Systems Analysis
- Systems Evaluation
- Number Facility
- Physics
- Originality
- Operations Analysis
- Learning Strategies
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Geographic information system , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Graphics or photo imaging software , Web platform development software , Data base user interface and query software , Presentation software , Process mapping and design software , Development environment software , Word processing software , Object or component oriented development software .
Specific to Surveying and Mapping Technicians
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Surveying and Mapping Technicians or Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Cartographers and Photogrammetrists
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geodetic Surveyors
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Surveyors
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Architectural and Civil Drafters
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Remote Sensing Technicians
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-remote-sensing-scientists-and-technologists
Singulariki. (2026). Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-remote-sensing-scientists-and-technologists
@misc{singulariki-surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-remote-sensing-scientists-and-technologists,
title = {Surveying and Mapping Technicians vs Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/surveying-and-mapping-technicians-vs-remote-sensing-scientists-and-technologists}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.