Urban and Regional Planners vs Transportation Planners
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Urban and Regional Planners and Transportation Planners on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Urban and Regional Planners | Transportation Planners |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $83,720 | $100,340 |
| Employment | 43,040 | 36,970 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+3.4%) | Declining (-1.7%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 3,400 | 3,200 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 94th pct | High · 94th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 78th pct · 41% of tasks | 90th pct · 52% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | — | Automation-leaning (47.2%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Law and Government, English Language, Geography, Active Listening, Speaking, Judgment and Decision Making, Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Transportation, Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, Systems Analysis, Written Comprehension, Written Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Speech Clarity, Writing, Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Complex Problem Solving, Systems Evaluation, Fluency of Ideas, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility, Administration and Management, Active Learning, Coordination, Time Management, Originality, Operations Analysis, Visualization.
Specific to Urban and Regional Planners
- Social Perceptiveness
- Communications and Media
- Sociology and Anthropology
- Negotiation
- Customer and Personal Service
- Service Orientation
- Persuasion
Specific to Transportation Planners
- Mathematics
- Computers and Electronics
- Mathematics
- Engineering and Technology
- Monitoring
- Mathematical Reasoning
- Flexibility of Closure
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Computer aided design CAD software , Geographic information system , Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Document management software , Graphics or photo imaging software , Desktop publishing software , Data base user interface and query software , Project management software , Word processing software , Object or component oriented development software , Enterprise resource planning ERP software , Analytical or scientific software , Map creation software .
Specific to Urban and Regional Planners
Specific to Transportation Planners
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Urban and Regional Planners or Transportation Planners — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Project Management Specialists
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Chief Sustainability Officers
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Sustainability Specialists
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Brownfield Redevelopment Specialists and Site Managers
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Climate Change Policy Analysts
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Environmental Restoration Planners
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Landscape Architects
- Urban and Regional Planners vs Conservation Scientists
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Urban and Regional Planners vs Transportation Planners." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/urban-and-regional-planners-vs-transportation-planners
Singulariki. (2026). Urban and Regional Planners vs Transportation Planners. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/urban-and-regional-planners-vs-transportation-planners
@misc{singulariki-urban-and-regional-planners-vs-transportation-planners,
title = {Urban and Regional Planners vs Transportation Planners},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/urban-and-regional-planners-vs-transportation-planners}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.