Food Service Counter Attendants
ISCO-08 5246 · 5 - Service and sales workers
On the International Labour Organization's 2025 global study, the 8 task statements that define Food Service Counter Attendants (ISCO-08 5246) score an average of 0.24 on a 0–1 exposure scale — more exposed than about 43% of the 427 placed occupations. Roughly 0% of its tasks fall somewhere on the exposed part of the gradient, and the typical task lands in the Not exposed band.
Exposure is task overlap, not a verdict. A high score means a generative-AI model can do part of the content of these tasks — it says nothing about whether the work is automated, whether anyone uses AI for it today, or whether jobs are lost. The gradient is scored on the international ISCO-08 system; the rest of Singulariki is U.S. O*NET/SOC, bridged below by an approximate, many-to-many crosswalk.
How its tasks split across the gradient
Each of the 8 scored tasks for this occupation, sorted into the six exposure bands — cool (human ground) to hot (almost fully assistable).
| Band | Tasks | Share | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not exposed | 8 | 100% | No meaningful GenAI capability on the task |
| Minimal | 0 | 0% | GenAI can touch the edges only |
| Gradient 1 | 0 | 0% | Lightly exposed — small assistable slices |
| Gradient 2 | 0 | 0% | Partly exposed — real assistable share |
| Gradient 3 | 0 | 0% | Heavily exposed — most of the task is assistable |
| Gradient 4 | 0 | 0% | Almost fully exposed |
The most-exposed task
“Ascertaining the products desired by the customer, assisting them in making choices and taking orders;”
Scores 0.46 on the 2025 scale. The task of ascertaining the products desired by the customer, assisting them in making choices, and taking orders involves a mix of structured information processing and unstructured, personalized customer interaction. Generative AI, like ChatGPT, excels in handling structured data and automating routine informational tasks, such as providing product details or guiding customers through a decision tree based on predefined preferences. This aligns closely with tasks like "Providing customers with full information about the goods for sale" and "Assisting the buyer in choosing a product," which have medium potential for automation with scores around 0.41 and 0.425, respectively. However, the task also demands nuanced human judgment and interpersonal skills to navigate customer preferences and complexities, similar to the challenges seen in customer service and sales roles, reducing the potential for full automation. Given the structured nature of portions of the task and the need for some level of human oversight—especially for personalized assistance and complex decision-making—a score of 0.47 reflects the currently feasible level of automation for this task, accounting for the capabilities of AI and the need for human interaction in more nuanced or complex inquiries. Furthermore, operating in a high-income country like Poland, where access to technology is widespread, supports the integration of AI for automating the structured parts of the task.
Moving fastest, 2023 → 2025
“Serving food to customers at counters;”
Model capability on this task changed by +0.19 in two years — the gradient is not static, it is filling in.
U.S. occupations this maps to
The American O*NET/SOC roles that crosswalk to ISCO-08 5246, biggest by employment first, via the published (approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 correspondence. These are the closest U.S. matches — not an asserted one-to-one identity.
In context
Part of the 5 - Service and sales workers major group. Return to the full gradient to see how the whole group sits.
Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation
Food Service Counter Attendants sit at the 43rd percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient
- Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Food Service Counter Attendants rank in the 43rd percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient
- About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
- Mean task exposure rose by 0.03 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots.ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025
- Its most-exposed task: "Ascertaining the products desired by the customer, assisting them in making choices and taking orders;".ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)
Food Service Counter Attendants sit at the 43rd percentile of the global GenAI exposure gradient • Across 427 international occupations scored by the ILO, Food Service Counter Attendants rank in the 43rd percentile for GenAI task exposure — overlap with what generative AI can attempt, not a projection of displacement. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025) GenAI exposure gradient) • About 0% of this occupation's tasks fall into an exposed gradient band. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)) • Mean task exposure rose by 0.03 between the 2023 and 2025 model-capability snapshots. (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025), 2023→2025) • Its most-exposed task: "Ascertaining the products desired by the customer, assisting them in making choices and taking orders;". (ILO / Gmyrek et al. (2025)) Source: Singulariki — "Food Service Counter Attendants". https://singulariki.com/gradient/5246-food-service-counter-attendants.html Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Datasets behind this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)