Skip to content
Singulariki

Interpreters and Translators vs Speech-Language Pathologists

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Interpreters and Translators and Speech-Language Pathologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Interpreters and Translators Speech-Language Pathologists
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$59,440
$95,410
Employment · BLS OEWS
53,360
178,790
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
100th pct
45th pct

At a glance

Dimension Interpreters and Translators Speech-Language Pathologists
Median pay $59,440 $95,410
Employment 53,360 178,790
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+1.7%) Growing fast (+15.0%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 6,900 13,300
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 100th pct Moderate · 45th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 97th pct · 59% of tasks 43rd pct · 24% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Automation-leaning (56.9%) Automation-leaning (44.7%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: English Language, Oral Expression, Speaking, Oral Comprehension, Active Listening, Written Comprehension, Written Expression, Reading Comprehension, Customer and Personal Service, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Writing, Information Ordering, Critical Thinking, Monitoring, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Education and Training, Administrative, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Service Orientation, Judgment and Decision Making, Deductive Reasoning, Learning Strategies, Coordination, Instructing, Complex Problem Solving, Time Management, Fluency of Ideas, Originality, Inductive Reasoning, Category Flexibility.

Specific to Interpreters and Translators

  • Foreign Language
  • Selective Attention
  • Public Safety and Security
  • Law and Government
  • Speed of Closure
  • Time Sharing
  • Auditory Attention

Specific to Speech-Language Pathologists

  • Psychology
  • Therapy and Counseling
  • Hearing Sensitivity
  • Flexibility of Closure
  • Sociology and Anthropology
  • Medicine and Dentistry
  • Systems Analysis

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Word processing software , Internet browser software .

Specific to Interpreters and Translators

Specific to Speech-Language Pathologists

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Interpreters and Translators or Speech-Language Pathologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Interpreters and Translators vs Speech-Language Pathologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/interpreters-and-translators-vs-speech-language-pathologists

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Interpreters and Translators vs Speech-Language Pathologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/interpreters-and-translators-vs-speech-language-pathologists

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-interpreters-and-translators-vs-speech-language-pathologists,
  title  = {Interpreters and Translators vs Speech-Language Pathologists},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/interpreters-and-translators-vs-speech-language-pathologists}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.