Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Law Teachers, Postsecondary
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates and Law Teachers, Postsecondary on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates | Law Teachers, Postsecondary |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $156,210 | $126,650 |
| Employment | 25,580 | 22,800 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+2.5%) | About average (+2.2%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 900 | 2,200 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Low · 21st pct | High · 93rd pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 59th pct · 31% of tasks | 70th pct · 37% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Automation-leaning (54.1%) | Augmentation-leaning (65.1%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | No | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Active Listening, Law and Government, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, English Language, Written Comprehension, Reading Comprehension, Judgment and Decision Making, Oral Expression, Inductive Reasoning, Writing, Speaking, Complex Problem Solving, Written Expression, Speech Clarity, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Monitoring, Information Ordering, Administration and Management, Time Management, Negotiation, Customer and Personal Service, Category Flexibility, Coordination, Persuasion, Instructing, Service Orientation, Systems Analysis, Fluency of Ideas, Originality, Systems Evaluation.
Specific to Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates
- Psychology
- Public Safety and Security
- Selective Attention
- Management of Personnel Resources
Specific to Law Teachers, Postsecondary
- Education and Training
- Learning Strategies
- Computers and Electronics
- Communications and Media
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Document management software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Legal management software , Information retrieval or search software , Web page creation and editing software , Data base user interface and query software , Internet browser software .
Specific to Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates
Specific to Law Teachers, Postsecondary
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates or Law Teachers, Postsecondary — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Judicial Law Clerks
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Lawyers
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Equal Opportunity Representatives and Officers
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Paralegals and Legal Assistants
- Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Detectives and Criminal Investigators
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Law Teachers, Postsecondary." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/judges-magistrate-judges-and-magistrates-vs-law-teachers-postsecondary
Singulariki. (2026). Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Law Teachers, Postsecondary. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/judges-magistrate-judges-and-magistrates-vs-law-teachers-postsecondary
@misc{singulariki-judges-magistrate-judges-and-magistrates-vs-law-teachers-postsecondary,
title = {Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates vs Law Teachers, Postsecondary},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/judges-magistrate-judges-and-magistrates-vs-law-teachers-postsecondary}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.