Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Judicial Law Clerks
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants and Judicial Law Clerks on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants | Judicial Law Clerks |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $54,140 | $60,400 |
| Employment | 154,540 | 13,220 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | Declining (-5.8%) | About average (+2.5%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 19,600 | 1,000 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 70th pct | Low · 20th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 93rd pct · 55% of tasks | 76th pct · 39% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Automation-leaning (64.4%) | Automation-leaning (45.1%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Administrative, English Language, Law and Government, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Near Vision, Computers and Electronics, Writing, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Speaking, Speech Recognition, Speech Clarity, Time Management, Information Ordering, Selective Attention, Public Safety and Security, Critical Thinking, Monitoring, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Service Orientation, Problem Sensitivity, Deductive Reasoning, Category Flexibility, Complex Problem Solving, Inductive Reasoning, Active Learning, Judgment and Decision Making, Fluency of Ideas, Far Vision, Originality.
Specific to Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants
- Customer and Personal Service
- Administration and Management
- Communications and Media
- Economics and Accounting
- Education and Training
- Personnel and Human Resources
Specific to Judicial Law Clerks
- Learning Strategies
- Persuasion
- Negotiation
- Flexibility of Closure
- Instructing
- Memorization
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Document management software , Data base user interface and query software , Calendar and scheduling software , Project management software , Information retrieval or search software , Analytical or scientific software , Internet browser software .
Specific to Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants
Specific to Judicial Law Clerks
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants or Judicial Law Clerks — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Paralegals and Legal Assistants
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Secretaries and Administrative Assistants, Except Legal, Medical, and Executive
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Court, Municipal, and License Clerks
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Court Reporters and Simultaneous Captioners
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Correspondence Clerks
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Office Clerks, General
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Eligibility Interviewers, Government Programs
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Judicial Law Clerks." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/legal-secretaries-and-administrative-assistants-vs-judicial-law-clerks
Singulariki. (2026). Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Judicial Law Clerks. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/legal-secretaries-and-administrative-assistants-vs-judicial-law-clerks
@misc{singulariki-legal-secretaries-and-administrative-assistants-vs-judicial-law-clerks,
title = {Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants vs Judicial Law Clerks},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/legal-secretaries-and-administrative-assistants-vs-judicial-law-clerks}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.