Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists and Molecular and Cellular Biologists on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists | Molecular and Cellular Biologists |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $100,590 | $93,330 |
| Employment | 156,300 | 59,710 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | Growing fast (+8.7%) | About average (+1.2%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 9,600 | 4,800 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 65th pct | High · 77th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 77th pct · 40% of tasks | 77th pct · 40% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (67.6%) | Augmentation-leaning (57.2%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | No |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Biology, Writing, Speaking, Science, Active Learning, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Inductive Reasoning, English Language, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Critical Thinking, Judgment and Decision Making, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility, Speech Clarity, Complex Problem Solving, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Mathematics, Monitoring, Chemistry, Learning Strategies, Mathematical Reasoning, Instructing, Fluency of Ideas, Originality, Flexibility of Closure, Mathematics, Number Facility, Selective Attention.
Specific to Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists
- Systems Analysis
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Systems Evaluation
- Service Orientation
- Time Management
Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists
- Education and Training
- Computers and Electronics
- Social Perceptiveness
- Coordination
- Persuasion
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Object or component oriented development software , Graphics or photo imaging software , Analytical or scientific software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Data base user interface and query software .
Specific to Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists
Specific to Molecular and Cellular Biologists
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists or Molecular and Cellular Biologists — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Geneticists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Biochemists and Biophysicists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Physicians, Pathologists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Microbiologists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Medical and Clinical Laboratory Technologists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Epidemiologists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Cytogenetic Technologists
- Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Histotechnologists
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/medical-scientists-except-epidemiologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists
Singulariki. (2026). Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/medical-scientists-except-epidemiologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists
@misc{singulariki-medical-scientists-except-epidemiologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists,
title = {Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists vs Molecular and Cellular Biologists},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/medical-scientists-except-epidemiologists-vs-molecular-and-cellular-biologists}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.