Skip to content
Singulariki

Park Naturalists vs Recreation Workers

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Park Naturalists and Recreation Workers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Park Naturalists Recreation Workers
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$67,950
$35,380
Employment · BLS OEWS
25,590
309,640
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
52nd pct
65th pct

At a glance

Dimension Park Naturalists Recreation Workers
Median pay $67,950 $35,380
Employment 25,590 309,640
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+3.4%) About average (+4.1%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 2,500 68,100
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not. Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not.
AI exposure · published exposure studies Moderate · 52nd pct Moderate · 65th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 74th pct · 38% of tasks 37th pct · 21% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Augmentation-leaning (58.0%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman No Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Customer and Personal Service, Speaking, Oral Expression, Speech Clarity, Education and Training, Oral Comprehension, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, English Language, Writing, Social Perceptiveness, Written Comprehension, Written Expression, Speech Recognition, Critical Thinking, Deductive Reasoning, Public Safety and Security, Service Orientation, Problem Sensitivity, Near Vision, Information Ordering, Law and Government, Active Learning, Learning Strategies, Instructing, Judgment and Decision Making, Fluency of Ideas, Far Vision, Monitoring, Coordination, Complex Problem Solving, Originality, Category Flexibility, Time Management, Management of Personnel Resources.

Specific to Park Naturalists

  • Biology
  • Communications and Media
  • Inductive Reasoning
  • History and Archeology
  • Geography

Specific to Recreation Workers

  • Psychology
  • Administrative
  • Persuasion
  • Computers and Electronics
  • Negotiation

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Office suite software , Spreadsheet software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Desktop publishing software , Internet browser software .

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Park Naturalists or Recreation Workers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Park Naturalists vs Recreation Workers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/park-naturalists-vs-recreation-workers

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Park Naturalists vs Recreation Workers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/park-naturalists-vs-recreation-workers

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-park-naturalists-vs-recreation-workers,
  title  = {Park Naturalists vs Recreation Workers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/park-naturalists-vs-recreation-workers}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.