Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Lawyers
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers and Lawyers on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers | Lawyers |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $115,230 | $151,160 |
| Employment | 16,230 | 747,750 |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | Declining (-0.7%) | About average (+4.1%) |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 500 | 31,500 |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | Moderate · 46th pct | Moderate · 62nd pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 59th pct · 31% of tasks | 67th pct · 36% of tasks |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (55.5%) | Augmentation-leaning (69.2%) |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | Yes |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Law and Government, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Critical Thinking, Oral Comprehension, Written Comprehension, Inductive Reasoning, Writing, Judgment and Decision Making, English Language, Written Expression, Deductive Reasoning, Speaking, Oral Expression, Problem Sensitivity, Social Perceptiveness, Complex Problem Solving, Speech Clarity, Customer and Personal Service, Active Learning, Information Ordering, Near Vision, Speech Recognition, Monitoring, Administrative, Negotiation, Time Management, Category Flexibility, Selective Attention, Learning Strategies, Coordination, Persuasion, Service Orientation, Fluency of Ideas, Originality, Instructing, Systems Analysis.
Specific to Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
- Medicine and Dentistry
- Administration and Management
- Flexibility of Closure
Specific to Lawyers
- Computers and Electronics
- Communications and Media
- Systems Evaluation
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Office suite software , Document management software , Data base user interface and query software , Spreadsheet software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Word processing software , Enterprise resource planning ERP software .
Specific to Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers or Lawyers — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Judicial Law Clerks
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Claims Adjusters, Examiners, and Investigators
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Equal Opportunity Representatives and Officers
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Labor Relations Specialists
- Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Fraud Examiners, Investigators and Analysts
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Lawyers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/administrative-law-judges-adjudicators-and-hearing-officers-vs-lawyers
Singulariki. (2026). Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Lawyers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/administrative-law-judges-adjudicators-and-hearing-officers-vs-lawyers
@misc{singulariki-administrative-law-judges-adjudicators-and-hearing-officers-vs-lawyers,
title = {Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers vs Lawyers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/administrative-law-judges-adjudicators-and-hearing-officers-vs-lawyers}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.