Skip to content
Singulariki

Physical Scientists, All Other

Occupation · SOC 19-2099.00

All physical scientists not listed separately.

Also called: Inventor · Physical Scientist · Research Scientist · Wood Technologist

Job family: Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-19-2099-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

74th-percentile task overlap — yet about 2,000 openings a year (+0.6% projected, BLS) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

This is a broad “All Other” catch-all that groups many different jobs, so treat the figures below as a rough average for the category, not a precise estimate for any single role within it.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 80th 1.1
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High 80th 0.9
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 59th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.0), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.4 · 45th percentile among occupations · Moderate

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +0.6% by 2034
Projected annual openings 2,000
Employment 2024 → 2034 31,900 → 32,100

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international 4 occupations below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

41% mean task exposure (2025)
78th percentile of 427 placed occupations
+5 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Meteorologists · 2112 54% Gradient 3
Chemists · 2113 39% Minimal
Physicists and Astronomers · 2111 38% Gradient 1
Geologists and geophysicists · 2114 36% Minimal

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

How to get in

Typical entry-level education
Bachelor's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement

What to study: Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies , Physical Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$62k10th$82k25th$118kMedian$155k75th$192k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
32k202432k2034 (proj.)+0.6% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $61,990
25th percentile $82,450
Median (50th) $117,960
75th percentile $154,900
90th percentile $191,880
People employed 22,580

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 4,280 $121,490
Educational Services · Sector 3,700 $80,130
Manufacturing · Sector 1,300 $145,640
Engineering Services · National industry 530 $79,160
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 490 $168,290
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 220 $122,660
Utilities · Sector 120 $101,560
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 100 $83,200
Temporary Help Services · National industry 70 $100,540
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · National industry 50 $114,750
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 40 $90,920
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 40 $114,790

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 4.01× 100
Engineering Services · National industry 3.13× 530
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 2.71× 4,280
Educational Services · Sector 1.85× 3,700
Utilities · Sector 1.41× 120
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 1.19× 490
Manufacturing · Sector 0.7× 1,300
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 0.17× 220

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Physical Scientists, All Other — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 78th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Physical Scientists, All Other show 74th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 2,000 annual U.S. openings

  • Physical Scientists, All Other rank in the 74th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 2,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+0.6%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $117,960, across about 22,580 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
Copy the whole kit
Physical Scientists, All Other show 74th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 2,000 annual U.S. openings

• Physical Scientists, All Other rank in the 74th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 2,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+0.6%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $117,960, across about 22,580 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))

Source: Singulariki — "Physical Scientists, All Other". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-2099-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Physical Scientists, All Other." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-2099-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Physical Scientists, All Other. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-2099-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-19-2099-00,
  title  = {Physical Scientists, All Other},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-2099-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.