Skip to content
Singulariki

Evaluate project feasibility

Work activity · O*NET

Evaluate project feasibility is an intermediate work activity in the O*NET database — a concrete task that recurs across many occupations , grouped under Judging the Qualities of Objects, Services, or People. 13 occupations report doing it as part of their work.

What it involves

The most common detailed activities O*NET records under this category, ranked by how many occupation tasks map to each.

  • Analyze data to determine project feasibility
  • Evaluate project designs to determine adequacy or feasibility

How AI is applied to this activity

Microsoft's "Working with AI" study mapped real Bing Copilot conversations to O*NET work activities. The figures below are their measurements for this activity — they describe how AI is used today in one assistant's data, not a forecast that the activity will be automated.

AI completes it successfully 86.3% When Copilot attempts this activity, how often it finishes the task
Scope AI handles 35.0% How much of the activity AI carries within a conversation
Positive user feedback 72.8% Share of interactions users rated positively
How often AI is applied here 45th pct Percentile across all measured activities by how often AI performs them

Source: Microsoft "Working with AI" (working-with-ai). A high completion rate means AI can assist the activity in isolation — it does not mean an occupation that performs it is being automated, since every job blends many activities.

Detailed work activities

The more granular units of work O*NET groups under this activity, ordered by how many occupations perform them.

Occupations that perform this activity

Ranked by how many of the occupation's tasks map to this activity.

Occupation Tasks
Architectural and Engineering Managers 2
Computer and Information Systems Managers 2
Biofuels Production Managers 1
Brownfield Redevelopment Specialists and Site Managers 1
Chief Sustainability Officers 1
Computer Network Architects 1
Computer and Information Research Scientists 1
Construction Managers 1
Data Warehousing Specialists 1
Farm and Home Management Educators 1
Statisticians 1
Telecommunications Engineering Specialists 1
Water Resource Specialists 1
Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay AI task-overlap (horizontal) versus median pay (vertical), each as a percentile across all scored occupations, for 13 occupations in occupations that perform Evaluate project feasibility.. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Biofuels Production Managers Construction Managers Computer and Information Research Scientists Farm and Home Management Educators AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
Occupations that perform Evaluate project feasibility., by AI task-overlap and median pay

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Evaluate project feasibility." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/activities/evaluate-project-feasibility

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Evaluate project feasibility. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/activities/evaluate-project-feasibility

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-evaluate-project-feasibility,
  title  = {Evaluate project feasibility},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/activities/evaluate-project-feasibility}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.