Often handed to AI
Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.
- Provide users with technical support for computer problems. · 0.8%
Occupation · SOC 11-3021.00
Plan, direct, or coordinate activities in such fields as electronic data processing, information systems, systems analysis, and computer programming.
Also called: Information Systems Director (IS Director) · Information Systems Manager (IS Manager) · Information Technology Director (IT Director) · Information Technology Manager (IT Manager) · Application Development Director · Computing Services Director · Data Processing Manager · Information Systems Supervisor (IS Supervisor) · MIS Director (Management Information Systems Director) · Technical Services Manager · Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) · Computer Operations Manager
Job family: Management Occupations
A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch
/roles/role-11-3021-00/context.md directly.
A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.
Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.
Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.
Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Independent published positions, read together — not a forecast.
71st-percentile task overlap — yet about 55,600 openings a year (+15.2% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 6772% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →
What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.
Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.
| Measure | Rank vs all occupations | Percentile | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High | 78th | 1.1 | |
| LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High | 84th | 0.9 | |
| AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate | 52nd | 0.2 |
OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.
Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.
A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.
Frey–Osborne probability 0.0 · 20th percentile among occupations · Low
Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.
| Consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to assess computing needs and system requirements. | 5.2% | |
| Evaluate the organization's technology use and needs and recommend improvements, such as hardware and software upgrades. | 1.3% | |
| Develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures. | 0.5% | |
| Review project plans to plan and coordinate project activity. | 0.3% | |
| Develop computer information resources, providing for data security and control, strategic computing, and disaster recovery. | 0.2% | |
| Provide users with technical support for computer problems. | 0.2% |
Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.
| Outlook | Growing fast · +15.2% by 2034 |
| Projected annual openings | 55,600 |
| Employment 2024 → 2034 | 667,100 → 768,700 |
“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.
The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.
| International occupation (ISCO-08) | Task exposure (2025) | Most tasks fall in |
|---|---|---|
| Information and Communications Technology Service Managers · 1330 | 44% | Gradient 2 |
Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.
How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.
| Augmentation vs. automation | 67.7% working with AI · 24.3% handed to AI |
| Most common way people use AI here | Learning · you ask AI to explain or teach |
| Typical AI autonomy | 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently |
| Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) | 58.6% |
The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.
| Task | How | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to assess computing needs and system requirements. | Learning | 6.1% |
| Evaluate the organization's technology use and needs and recommend improvements, such as hardware and software upgrades. | Learning | 2.2% |
| Develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures. | Iteration | 1.4% |
| Provide users with technical support for computer problems. | Directive | 0.8% |
Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.
| Develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures. | 96.4% | |
| Provide users with technical support for computer problems. | 93.8% | |
| Evaluate the organization's technology use and needs and recommend improvements, such as hardware and software upgrades. | 93.5% | |
| Consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to assess computing needs and system requirements. | 92.8% |
Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.
Help me consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to assess computing needs and system requirements. From: Consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to assess computing needs and system requirements. · 6.1% of measured AI use · learning
Help me evaluate the organization's technology use and needs and recommend improvements, such as hardware and software upgrades. From: Evaluate the organization's technology use and needs and recommend improvements, such as hardware and software upgrades. · 2.2% of measured AI use · learning
Help me develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures. From: Develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures. · 1.4% of measured AI use · task iteration
Help me provide users with technical support for computer problems. From: Provide users with technical support for computer problems. · 0.8% of measured AI use · directive
All 17 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.
O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
| Computers and Electronics | 4.8 | |
| Customer and Personal Service | 4.0 | |
| Administration and Management | 3.7 | |
| Engineering and Technology | 3.5 | |
| English Language | 3.5 | |
| Personnel and Human Resources | 3.4 | |
| Mathematics | 3.2 |
| Critical Thinking | 4.1 | |
| Reading Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Active Listening | 4.0 | |
| Speaking | 3.9 | |
| Monitoring | 3.9 | |
| Writing | 3.8 | |
| Active Learning | 3.4 | |
| Learning Strategies | 3.3 | |
| Mathematics | 3.1 |
| Oral Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Written Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Oral Expression | 4.0 | |
| Problem Sensitivity | 4.0 | |
| Deductive Reasoning | 4.0 | |
| Inductive Reasoning | 4.0 | |
| Written Expression | 3.8 | |
| Information Ordering | 3.8 | |
| Near Vision | 3.8 | |
| Speech Clarity | 3.6 | |
| Fluency of Ideas | 3.4 | |
| Speech Recognition | 3.4 | |
| Originality | 3.3 | |
| Category Flexibility | 3.3 |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.9 | |
| Coordination | 3.8 | |
| Complex Problem Solving | 3.8 | |
| Social Perceptiveness | 3.6 | |
| Systems Analysis | 3.6 | |
| Systems Evaluation | 3.6 | |
| Management of Personnel Resources | 3.6 | |
| Time Management | 3.4 | |
| Persuasion | 3.1 | |
| Instructing | 3.1 |
Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.
Showing the top 40 of 86.
Showing the top 40 of 177.
How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.
What to study: Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Computer and Information Sciences and Support Services , Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.
Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.
| Bachelor's Degree | 47.7% | |
| Some College Courses | 26.0% | |
| Master's Degree | 14.4% | |
| Post-Secondary Certificate | 5.8% | |
| Post-Baccalaureate Certificate | 2.8% | |
| Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) | 2.2% | |
| High School Diploma | 1.3% |
The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.
| Dependability | 9.0 | |
| Attention to Detail | 8.0 | |
| Integrity | 7.0 | |
| Intellectual Curiosity | 6.0 | |
| Achievement Orientation | 5.0 | |
| Adaptability | 4.0 | |
| Innovation | 3.0 |
| Management/Administration | 6.4 | |
| Information Technology | 6.1 | |
| Business Initiatives | 4.5 | |
| Human Resources | 3.0 | |
| Public Speaking | 3.0 | |
| Mathematics/Statistics | 2.8 |
| Conventional | 5.9 | |
| Enterprising | 5.1 | |
| Investigative | 4.5 |
U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)
| 10th percentile | $104,450 |
| 25th percentile | $134,350 |
| Median (50th) | $171,200 |
| 75th percentile | $216,220 |
| 90th percentile | — |
| People employed | 645,970 |
Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.
| Industry | Workers | National median pay |
|---|---|---|
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 205,040 | $174,010 |
| Information · Sector | 85,400 | $196,060 |
| Finance and Insurance · Sector | 78,960 | $176,570 |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector | 71,800 | $172,830 |
| Manufacturing · Sector | 41,050 | $174,790 |
| Educational Services · Sector | 30,810 | $127,360 |
| Wholesale Trade · Sector | 27,610 | $170,400 |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector | 20,380 | $163,100 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 20,290 | $151,220 |
| Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers · National industry | 8,520 | $169,310 |
| Transportation and Warehousing · Sector | 7,380 | $168,210 |
| Engineering Services · National industry | 6,870 | $171,880 |
Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).
| Industry | Concentration | Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Information · Sector | 7.01× | 85,400 |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector | 6.1× | 71,800 |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 4.54× | 205,040 |
| Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers · National industry | 4.53× | 8,520 |
| Finance and Insurance · Sector | 3.03× | 78,960 |
| Insurance Agencies and Brokerages · National industry | 1.56× | 6,480 |
| Engineering Services · National industry | 1.42× | 6,870 |
| Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry | 1.37× | 350 |
Part of the Digital Technology career cluster.
Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.
Options the data surfaces for Computer and Information Systems Managers — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.
Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.
Occupations O*NET rates as related — the nearby moves on the map.
How people typically prepare for this work.
On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 82nd percentile of 427 international occupations.
Computer and Information Systems Managers show 71st-percentile AI task overlap — and about 55,600 annual U.S. openings
Computer and Information Systems Managers show 71st-percentile AI task overlap — and about 55,600 annual U.S. openings • Computer and Information Systems Managers rank in the 71st percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE) • The occupation is projected to see about 55,600 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+15.2%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • Median annual pay is $171,200, across about 645,970 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024)) • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 68% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) Source: Singulariki — "Computer and Information Systems Managers". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-3021-00 Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Singulariki. "Computer and Information Systems Managers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-3021-00
Singulariki. (2026). Computer and Information Systems Managers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-3021-00
@misc{singulariki-role-11-3021-00,
title = {Computer and Information Systems Managers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-3021-00}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.