Skip to content
Singulariki

Architectural and Engineering Managers

Occupation · SOC 11-9041.00

Plan, direct, or coordinate activities in such fields as architecture and engineering or research and development in these fields.

Also called: Engineering Director · Engineering Program Manager · Project Engineering Manager · Project Manager · Civil Engineering Manager · Electrical Engineering Manager · Engineering Group Manager · Mechanical Engineering Manager · Process Engineering Manager · Architect Manager · Architectural Project Manager · Civil Project Manager (Civil PM)

Job family: Management Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-11-9041-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand. · 0.8%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. · 6.4%
  • Administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance. · 0.6%
  • Direct the engineering of water control, treatment, or distribution projects. · 0.4%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand. · 94.7% need a human
  • Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. · 94.7% need a human
  • Administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance. · 93.0% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

70th-percentile task overlap — yet about 14,500 openings a year (+3.8% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 6630% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 68th 0.8
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High 85th 0.9
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 56th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.0), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.0 · 13th percentile among occupations · Low

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. 5.0%
Prepare budgets, bids, or contracts. 2.4%
Develop or implement programs to improve sustainability or reduce the environmental impacts of engineering or architecture activities or operations. 0.5%
Consult or negotiate with clients to prepare project specifications. 0.3%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +3.8% by 2034
Projected annual openings 14,500
Employment 2024 → 2034 212,500 → 220,500

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

40% mean task exposure (2025)
77th percentile of 427 placed occupations
+16 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Research and Development Managers · 1223 40% Minimal

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 66.3% working with AI · 26.0% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Iteration · you and AI go back and forth
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 74.0%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. Iteration 6.4%
Assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand. Directive 0.8%
Administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance. Iteration 0.6%
Direct the engineering of water control, treatment, or distribution projects. Iteration 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand. 94.7%
Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. 94.7%
Administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance. 93.0%
Direct the engineering of water control, treatment, or distribution projects. 80.6%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients.

    From: Present and explain proposals, reports, or findings to clients. · 6.4% of measured AI use · task iteration

  • Help me assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand.

    From: Assess project feasibility by analyzing technology, resource needs, and market demand. · 0.8% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance.

    From: Administer highway planning, construction, or maintenance. · 0.6% of measured AI use · task iteration

  • Help me direct the engineering of water control, treatment, or distribution projects.

    From: Direct the engineering of water control, treatment, or distribution projects. · 0.4% of measured AI use · task iteration

Tasks

All 21 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Design 4.3
Engineering and Technology 4.3
Mathematics 3.9
Administration and Management 3.9
English Language 3.9
Customer and Personal Service 3.8
Mechanical 3.7
Computers and Electronics 3.4

Abilities

Written Comprehension 4.3
Oral Comprehension 4.1
Oral Expression 4.1
Speech Clarity 4.0
Written Expression 3.9
Problem Sensitivity 3.9
Deductive Reasoning 3.9
Inductive Reasoning 3.9
Mathematical Reasoning 3.9
Fluency of Ideas 3.8
Information Ordering 3.8
Visualization 3.8
Near Vision 3.8
Speech Recognition 3.8
Originality 3.6
Number Facility 3.4

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 4.1
Active Listening 4.0
Writing 4.0
Speaking 4.0
Mathematics 3.9
Critical Thinking 3.9
Active Learning 3.9
Monitoring 3.8
Learning Strategies 3.3

Transferable skills

Complex Problem Solving 4.0
Judgment and Decision Making 3.9
Time Management 3.9
Coordination 3.8
Social Perceptiveness 3.5
Instructing 3.3
Service Orientation 3.3

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Showing the top 40 of 76.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Autodesk AutoCAD Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology In demand
Amazon DynamoDB Data base management system software Hot technology
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud EC2 Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Amazon Redshift Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Amazon Web Services AWS software Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Ansible software Expert system software Hot technology
Apache Cassandra Data base management system software Hot technology
Apache Hadoop Data base management system software Hot technology
Apache Hive Data base management system software Hot technology
Apache Kafka Development environment software Hot technology
Apache Maven Development environment software Hot technology
Apple macOS Operating system software Hot technology
Atlassian Confluence Project management software Hot technology
Atlassian JIRA Content workflow software Hot technology
Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Autodesk Revit Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Bash Operating system software Hot technology
Bentley MicroStation Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
C Development environment software Hot technology
C# Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
C++ Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
Chef Configuration management software Hot technology
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Django Web platform development software Hot technology
Docker Application server software Hot technology
Elasticsearch Data base management system software Hot technology
ESRI ArcGIS software Geographic information system Hot technology
Extensible markup language XML Enterprise application integration software Hot technology
Git File versioning software Hot technology
GitHub Application server software Hot technology
Go Development environment software Hot technology
IBM SPSS Statistics Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
JavaScript Web platform development software Hot technology
JavaScript Object Notation JSON Web platform development software Hot technology
Kronos Workforce Timekeeper Time accounting software Hot technology
Linux Operating system software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology

Showing the top 40 of 127.

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

E-Mail 5.0
Telephone Conversations 4.9
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.9
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.9
Contact With Others 4.5
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.5
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.5
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 4.5
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.2
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 4.2
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 4.2
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 4.2
Frequency of Decision Making 4.0
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.0
Spend Time Sitting 4.0
Time Pressure 3.8
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.5
Written Letters and Memos 3.4
Level of Competition 3.4
Conflict Situations 3.3
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.2
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 3.1
Physical Proximity 3.0
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 3.0
Public Speaking 3.0
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 2.8
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.6
Consequence of Error 2.5
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 2.3
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 2.3
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 2.2
Exposed to Contaminants 2.2
Spend Time Standing 2.2
Degree of Automation 2.0
Spend Time Walking or Running 1.9
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 1.8
Outdoors, Under Cover 1.7
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 1.7
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 1.7
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 1.6

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 5 — Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Education
Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
Typical entry-level education
Bachelor's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Extensive skill, knowledge, and experience are needed for these occupations. Many require more than five years of experience. For example, surgeons must complete four years of college and an additional five to seven years of specialized medical training to be able to do their job.
Preparation level
SVP (8.0 and above) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Architecture and Related Services , Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Engineering , Engineering/Engineering-Related Technologies/Technicians , Physical Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Bachelor's Degree 45.5%
Master's Degree 27.0%
First Professional Degree 12.2%
Post-Master's Certificate 11.8%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 1.1%
Post-Baccalaureate Certificate 1.1%
Doctoral Degree 1.1%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Work styles

Dependability 10.0
Attention to Detail 9.0
Integrity 8.0
Cautiousness 7.0
Intellectual Curiosity 6.0
Achievement Orientation 5.0
Innovation 4.0
Leadership Orientation 3.0

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Enterprising 6.4
Investigative 4.6
Conventional 4.4

Interest areas

Management/Administration 6.3
Business Initiatives 5.3
Engineering 5.0
Public Speaking 3.8
Mathematics/Statistics 3.3

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

213k2024221k2034 (proj.)+3.8% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $111,450
25th percentile $134,930
Median (50th) $167,740
75th percentile $207,210
90th percentile
People employed 210,340

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 77,010 $169,210
Manufacturing · Sector 73,820 $166,850
Engineering Services · National industry 44,790 $167,720
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 11,580 $173,200
Wholesale Trade · Sector 8,030 $167,760
Utilities · Sector 4,690 $165,300
Construction · Sector 4,050 $153,510
Information · Sector 3,470 $204,010
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 2,320 $169,200
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction · Sector 1,880 $206,480
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 1,800 $143,730
Finance and Insurance · Sector 930 $175,620

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Engineering Services · National industry 28.4× 44,790
Nuclear Electric Power Generation · National industry 13.62× 690
Wind Electric Power Generation · National industry 12.55× 170
Solar Electric Power Generation · National industry 10.51× 200
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 7.74× 1,800
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · National industry 6.68× 650
Utilities · Sector 5.93× 4,690
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 5.24× 77,010

Part of the Advanced Manufacturing , Agriculture , Arts, Entertainment, & Design , Construction and Energy & Natural Resources career clusters.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Architectural and Engineering Managers sits at the 70th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 99th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Architectural and Engineering Managers Electrical Engineers Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians Electronics Engineers, Except Computer Architectural and Civil Drafters Logistics Engineers Project Management Specialists AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Architectural and Engineering Managers — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 77th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Architectural and Engineering Managers show 70th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 14,500 annual U.S. openings

  • Architectural and Engineering Managers rank in the 70th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 14,500 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+3.8%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $167,740, across about 210,340 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 66% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Architectural and Engineering Managers show 70th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 14,500 annual U.S. openings

• Architectural and Engineering Managers rank in the 70th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 14,500 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+3.8%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $167,740, across about 210,340 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 66% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Architectural and Engineering Managers". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9041-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Architectural and Engineering Managers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9041-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Architectural and Engineering Managers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9041-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-11-9041-00,
  title  = {Architectural and Engineering Managers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9041-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.