Skip to content
Singulariki

Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education

Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index

A factual, source-backed comparison of Instructional Coordinators and Teaching Assistants, Special Education on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”

Instructional Coordinators Teaching Assistants, Special Education
Median pay · BLS OEWS
$74,720
Employment · BLS OEWS
210,850
AI exposure (percentile) · task overlap, not automation
91st pct
36th pct

At a glance

Dimension Instructional Coordinators Teaching Assistants, Special Education
Median pay $74,720
Employment 210,850
Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection About average (+1.3%)
Annual openings · BLS projection 21,900
Typical education · O*NET Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree.
AI exposure · published exposure studies High · 91st pct Moderate · 36th pct
Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk 76th pct · 39% of tasks
Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index Augmentation-leaning (53.1%)
Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman Yes

Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.

Skills

Shared: Education and Training, Written Comprehension, English Language, Learning Strategies, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Writing, Speaking, Instructing, Oral Comprehension, Speech Clarity, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Monitoring, Problem Sensitivity, Speech Recognition, Critical Thinking, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Complex Problem Solving, Deductive Reasoning, Near Vision, Judgment and Decision Making, Originality, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility, Service Orientation, Time Management, Fluency of Ideas, Customer and Personal Service, Persuasion.

Specific to Instructional Coordinators

  • Administration and Management
  • Mathematics
  • Computers and Electronics
  • Public Safety and Security
  • Personnel and Human Resources
  • Communications and Media
  • Sociology and Anthropology

Specific to Teaching Assistants, Special Education

  • Psychology
  • Selective Attention
  • Auditory Attention
  • Time Sharing
  • Negotiation
  • Far Vision
  • Flexibility of Closure

Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).

Tools & technology

Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Video creation and editing software , Data base user interface and query software , Project management software , Word processing software , Computer based training software .

Full profiles

This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Instructional Coordinators or Teaching Assistants, Special Education — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.

More comparisons

Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education,
  title  = {Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.