Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education
Side-by-side · O*NET · BLS · AI-exposure research · Anthropic Economic Index
A factual, source-backed comparison of Instructional Coordinators and Teaching Assistants, Special Education on the dimensions both occupations carry. Every figure is a position within an independent published dataset — not a verdict on which job is better, safer, or more “future-proof.”
At a glance
| Dimension | Instructional Coordinators | Teaching Assistants, Special Education |
|---|---|---|
| Median pay | $74,720 | — |
| Employment | 210,850 | — |
| Employment outlook (2024–34) · BLS projection | About average (+1.3%) | — |
| Annual openings · BLS projection | 21,900 | — |
| Typical education · O*NET | Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree). | Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree. |
| AI exposure · published exposure studies | High · 91st pct | Moderate · 36th pct |
| Global GenAI gradient · ILO ISCO-08 · via crosswalk | 76th pct · 39% of tasks | — |
| Observed AI use · Anthropic Economic Index | Augmentation-leaning (53.1%) | — |
| Mostly remote-capable · Dingel–Neiman | Yes | — |
Pay and employment are BLS OEWS estimates; outlook and openings are BLS 2024–2034 projections; AI exposure and observed-use figures come from separate research and reflect exposure and usage, not predictions that either job will disappear. Compare like with like.
Skills
Shared: Education and Training, Written Comprehension, English Language, Learning Strategies, Oral Expression, Written Expression, Writing, Speaking, Instructing, Oral Comprehension, Speech Clarity, Reading Comprehension, Active Listening, Monitoring, Problem Sensitivity, Speech Recognition, Critical Thinking, Active Learning, Social Perceptiveness, Coordination, Complex Problem Solving, Deductive Reasoning, Near Vision, Judgment and Decision Making, Originality, Inductive Reasoning, Information Ordering, Category Flexibility, Service Orientation, Time Management, Fluency of Ideas, Customer and Personal Service, Persuasion.
Specific to Instructional Coordinators
- Administration and Management
- Mathematics
- Computers and Electronics
- Public Safety and Security
- Personnel and Human Resources
- Communications and Media
- Sociology and Anthropology
Specific to Teaching Assistants, Special Education
- Psychology
- Selective Attention
- Auditory Attention
- Time Sharing
- Negotiation
- Far Vision
- Flexibility of Closure
Knowledge, skills & abilities O*NET rates as important for each occupation. “Shared” are common to both; the columns list what is distinctive to each (top by the order O*NET surfaces).
Tools & technology
Shared: Spreadsheet software , Office suite software , Electronic mail software , Presentation software , Video creation and editing software , Data base user interface and query software , Project management software , Word processing software , Computer based training software .
Specific to Instructional Coordinators
Specific to Teaching Assistants, Special Education
Full profiles
This page is a summary. See the complete source-backed profile for Instructional Coordinators or Teaching Assistants, Special Education — tasks, the full skill graph, tools, work context, preparation, wages by percentile, industries, AI exposure and the AI work map.
More comparisons
Related occupations you can place side by side on the same sourced scale.
- Instructional Coordinators vs Training and Development Specialists
- Instructional Coordinators vs Education Teachers, Postsecondary
- Instructional Coordinators vs Training and Development Managers
- Instructional Coordinators vs Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School
- Instructional Coordinators vs Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education
- Instructional Coordinators vs Special Education Teachers, Secondary School
- Instructional Coordinators vs Tutors
- Instructional Coordinators vs Special Education Teachers, Kindergarten
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai Microsoft Research
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
- ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025 International Labour Organization
- IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022 Institute for Structural Research (IBS)
- Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation academic
- Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome academic
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education
Singulariki. (2026). Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education
@misc{singulariki-instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education,
title = {Instructional Coordinators vs Teaching Assistants, Special Education},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/compare/instructional-coordinators-vs-teaching-assistants-special-education}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.