Skip to content
Singulariki

Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders

Occupation · SOC 51-6063.00

Set up, operate, or tend machines that knit, loop, weave, or draw in textiles.

Also called: Knitter · Machine Operator · Tufting Operator · Weaver · Knitting Machine Operator · Loom Fixer · Operator · Tufting Machine Operator · Warp Knit Operator · Winder Operator · Automated Weaver · Automatic Full-Fashioned Hosiery Knitting Machine Operator

Job family: Production Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-51-6063-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Program electronic equipment. · 4.7%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Program electronic equipment. · 70.6% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

17th-percentile task overlap — yet about 1,700 openings a year (-11.2% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 2724% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Low 9th -1.2
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low 24th 0.2
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Low 27th 0.1

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.2), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.2). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.7 · 60th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Program electronic equipment. 13.7%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook Declining · -11.2% by 2034
Projected annual openings 1,700
Employment 2024 → 2034 15,300 → 13,600

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

17% mean task exposure (2025)
20th percentile of 427 placed occupations
+2 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Weaving and Knitting Machine Operators · 8152 17% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 27.2% working with AI · 67.9% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 50.2%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Program electronic equipment. Directive 4.7%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Program electronic equipment. 70.6%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me program electronic equipment.

    From: Program electronic equipment. · 4.7% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 20 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Abilities

Arm-Hand Steadiness 3.9
Finger Dexterity 3.6
Control Precision 3.6
Multilimb Coordination 3.5
Manual Dexterity 3.3
Trunk Strength 3.3
Oral Comprehension 3.1
Problem Sensitivity 3.1
Selective Attention 3.1
Near Vision 3.1
Oral Expression 3.0
Visualization 3.0
Reaction Time 3.0
Auditory Attention 3.0
Deductive Reasoning 2.9
Information Ordering 2.9
Perceptual Speed 2.9
Extent Flexibility 2.9
Visual Color Discrimination 2.9
Speech Recognition 2.9
Speech Clarity 2.9
Written Comprehension 2.8
Inductive Reasoning 2.8
Category Flexibility 2.8
Flexibility of Closure 2.8
Stamina 2.8

Knowledge

Production and Processing 3.4
English Language 3.2
Mechanical 3.0
Public Safety and Security 2.6
Education and Training 2.6

Transferable skills

Operations Monitoring 3.4
Operation and Control 3.0
Quality Control Analysis 2.9
Time Management 2.6

Essential skills

Monitoring 3.1
Active Listening 3.0
Speaking 2.9
Critical Thinking 2.9
Reading Comprehension 2.8

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.8
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 4.6
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 4.4
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.3
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 4.2
Time Pressure 4.1
Spend Time Standing 4.0
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.0
Spend Time Walking or Running 3.9
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.8
Contact With Others 3.8
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.6
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 3.6
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.6
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.5
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.5
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.5
Exposed to Contaminants 3.5
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 3.4
Physical Proximity 3.3
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.1
Exposed to Minor Burns, Cuts, Bites, or Stings 3.0
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 2.9
Frequency of Decision Making 2.9
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 2.8
Level of Competition 2.7
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 2.6
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.4
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 2.3
Consequence of Error 2.3
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 2.2
Conflict Situations 2.2
Spend Time Sitting 2.1
Written Letters and Memos 1.9
Public Speaking 1.9
Degree of Automation 1.9
Spend Time Keeping or Regaining Balance 1.8
Telephone Conversations 1.8
E-Mail 1.7
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 1.7

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
High school diploma or equivalent · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 94.7%
Less than a High School Diploma 5.3%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 7.0
Conventional 4.3
Investigative 1.8
Artistic 1.6
Enterprising 1.4

Interest areas

Physical/Manual Labor 3.1
Mechanics/Electronics 2.7
Engineering 2.0
Transportation/Machine Operation 2.0
Applied Arts and Design 1.5
Construction/Woodwork 1.3
Management/Administration 1.3
Visual Arts 1.2

Work styles

Attention to Detail 2.1
Dependability 2.1
Cautiousness 2.0

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$30k10th$35k25th$38kMedian$44k75th$48k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
15k202414k2034 (proj.)-11.2% · Declining
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $29,640
25th percentile $34,530
Median (50th) $38,260
75th percentile $44,180
90th percentile $48,070
People employed 14,530

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Manufacturing · Sector 13,880 $38,280
Wholesale Trade · Sector 340 $35,260
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 260 $35,430
Temporary Help Services · National industry 150 $36,310

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Manufacturing · Sector 11.54× 13,880
Wholesale Trade · Sector 0.6× 340
Temporary Help Services · National industry 0.6× 150
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 0.31× 260

Part of the Advanced Manufacturing career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders sits at the 17th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 10th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders Extruding and Forming Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Synthetic and Glass Fibers Sewing Machine Operators Paper Goods Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders Woodworking Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Except Sawing AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders show 17th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 1,700 annual U.S. openings

  • Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders rank in the 17th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 1,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be declining (-11.2%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $38,260, across about 14,530 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 27% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders show 17th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 1,700 annual U.S. openings

• Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders rank in the 17th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 1,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be declining (-11.2%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $38,260, across about 14,530 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 27% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6063-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6063-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6063-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-51-6063-00,
  title  = {Textile Knitting and Weaving Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6063-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.