Skip to content
Singulariki

Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities

Work context · O*NET

Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities is a work-context dimension in the O*NET database — one of the standardized conditions O*NET uses to describe the environment a job is done in , grouped under Interpersonal Relationships. O*NET defines it by asking workers: "How important is it to coordinate or lead others (not as a supervisor or team leader) in accomplishing work activities in this job?." It is rated for 894 occupations, which average 3.57 out of 5 (high relative to other context dimensions).

How it's measured

O*NET rates each occupation on this dimension on a 1–5 context-importance scale (the CX scale), where higher means the condition is a more frequent or more central part of the work. The figures on this page are those occupation-level ratings — a description of working conditions as workers report them, not a judgment about pay, difficulty, or whether a job is "good."

Economy-wide average 3.57 / 5 Mean across all 894 rated occupations
Range across occupations 1.58–4.79 Lowest to highest occupation rating (spread 3.21)
Intensity vs. other dimensions 77th pct Where this dimension's average ranks among all O*NET work-context dimensions

Occupations where it's highest

The occupations that rate this condition strongest on the 1–5 scale.

Occupation Rating Score
Dispatchers, Except Police, Fire, and Ambulance 4.79
Orthodontists 4.79
First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers 4.70
Audio and Video Technicians 4.69
Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education 4.67
Prosthodontists 4.67
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 4.65
Gambling Managers 4.63
Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners 4.63
Obstetricians and Gynecologists 4.62
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physicians 4.61
Special Education Teachers, Secondary School 4.61
Educational, Guidance, and Career Counselors and Advisors 4.60
Postmasters and Mail Superintendents 4.59
First-Line Supervisors of Non-Retail Sales Workers 4.56
Computer and Information Systems Managers 4.55
Veterinarians 4.54
First-Line Supervisors of Landscaping, Lawn Service, and Groundskeeping Workers 4.53
Media Technical Directors/Managers 4.53
Solar Energy Installation Managers 4.52
First-Line Supervisors of Firefighting and Prevention Workers 4.51
Food Service Managers 4.51
Lodging Managers 4.51
General and Operations Managers 4.48
First-Line Supervisors of Security Workers 4.47

Occupations where it's lowest

The occupations that rate this condition weakest — where it is rarely part of the work.

Occupation Rating Score
Animal Breeders 1.58
Poets, Lyricists and Creative Writers 1.62
Musical Instrument Repairers and Tuners 1.67
Craft Artists 1.73
Massage Therapists 1.73
Passenger Attendants 1.90
Postal Service Mail Carriers 1.96
Watch and Clock Repairers 1.97
Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate 2.04
Cooks, Private Household 2.04
Tire Builders 2.12
Tax Preparers 2.19
Acupuncturists 2.21
Fine Artists, Including Painters, Sculptors, and Illustrators 2.24
Pressers, Textile, Garment, and Related Materials 2.24
Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators 2.25
Shoe and Leather Workers and Repairers 2.25
Cutting, Punching, and Press Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic 2.26
Crossing Guards and Flaggers 2.32
Sewing Machine Operators 2.32
Graders and Sorters, Agricultural Products 2.35
Mathematicians 2.35
Payroll and Timekeeping Clerks 2.36
Metal-Refining Furnace Operators and Tenders 2.37
Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand 2.38

How AI is used by roles where coordinate or lead others in accomplishing work activities is central

A working condition is not itself "being automated" — but we can look at the occupations where it is most central and ask how those people actually use AI. This rolls the Anthropic Economic Index per-role signal up across the roles that rate this condition 3 or higher (CX-rating-weighted). 58.8% of the 781 occupations where this condition is present carry observed AI-usage data (459 roles).

Across those roles, 46.5% of AI conversations are people working with AI and 31.8% hand a task to AI , with an average autonomy of 3.57 / 5.

Collaboration pattern Share What it means
directive 29.4% AI does it; you give the instruction
task iteration 24.2% you and AI go back and forth
learning 19.5% you ask AI to explain or teach
validation 2.8% you do it; AI checks your work
feedback loop 2.3% AI does it, then adjusts from your feedback

Roles behind this signal

The occupations where this condition is most central and that also have the most AEI data. "Works with AI" is the role's share of conversations that augment rather than automate.

Occupation Condition (1–5) Works with AI Autonomy
English Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.9 63.2% 4.0/5
Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary 4.2 63.2% 4.0/5
Editors 4.2 68.2% 4.0/5
Educational, Guidance, School, and Vocational Counselors 4.6 70.6% 4.0/5
Recreation and Fitness Studies Teachers, Postsecondary 4.3 66.2% 3.3/5
Foreign Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.4 65.2% 3.0/5
Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary 4.1 67.2% 3.5/5
Education Teachers, Postsecondary 4.2 65.3% 3.5/5
Instructional Coordinators 4.2 53.1% 4.0/5
Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Teachers, Postsecondary 4.0 65.7% 3.3/5
Health Specialties Teachers, Postsecondary 4.0 66.2% 3.5/5
Technical Writers 3.3 54.2% 4.0/5

Source: Anthropic Economic Index (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) over a sample of Claude.ai Free and Pro conversations — not all AI tools and not the whole workforce. This is a role-weighted projection from AEI-linked occupations where this condition is central, not a direct measurement of AI use for the condition itself. Shares are weighted by how central the condition is to each role; some conversations are left unclassified by Anthropic's taxonomy, so shares need not sum to 100.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27). Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/work-context/coordinate-or-lead-others-in-accomplishing-work-activities

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/work-context/coordinate-or-lead-others-in-accomplishing-work-activities

BibTeX 
@misc{singulariki-coordinate-or-lead-others-in-accomplishing-work-activities,
  title  = {Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27). Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/work-context/coordinate-or-lead-others-in-accomplishing-work-activities}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.