Skip to content
Singulariki

Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders

Occupation · SOC 51-6062.00

Set up, operate, or tend machines that cut textiles.

Also called: Cutter · Cutter Operator · Fabric Cutter · Spreader · Automated Cutting Machine Operator · CNC Cutting Operator (Computer Numerical Control Cutting Operator) · Die Cut Operator · Laser Operator · Spread Cutter · Textile Slitting Machine Operator · Automatic Die Cutting Machine Operator · Automatic Folding Machine Operator

Job family: Production Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-51-6062-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Program electronic equipment. · 4.7%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Program electronic equipment. · 70.6% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

24th-percentile task overlap — yet about 1,000 openings a year (-11.7% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 2724% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Low 17th -1.0
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low 26th 0.2
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 34th 0.1

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.2), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.2). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Mixed signals. Today's AI/LLM studies show relatively low exposure for this job, but the older (2013) Frey–Osborne work rated it higher for computerization and robotics. Different eras, different technologies — the AI measures above reflect the current state.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.9 · 89th percentile among occupations · High

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Program electronic equipment. 13.7%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook Declining · -11.7% by 2034
Projected annual openings 1,000
Employment 2024 → 2034 9,300 → 8,200

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

17% mean task exposure (2025)
21st percentile of 427 placed occupations
−11 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Garment and Related Patternmakers and Cutters · 7532 17% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 27.2% working with AI · 67.9% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 50.2%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Program electronic equipment. Directive 4.7%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Program electronic equipment. 70.6%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me program electronic equipment.

    From: Program electronic equipment. · 4.7% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 18 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Transferable skills

Operations Monitoring 3.8
Operation and Control 3.4
Quality Control Analysis 3.1
Coordination 3.0
Equipment Maintenance 3.0
Troubleshooting 3.0
Repairing 3.0
Judgment and Decision Making 2.9
Time Management 2.9

Abilities

Arm-Hand Steadiness 3.6
Information Ordering 3.3
Manual Dexterity 3.3
Problem Sensitivity 3.1
Selective Attention 3.1
Finger Dexterity 3.1
Control Precision 3.1
Multilimb Coordination 3.1
Reaction Time 3.1
Static Strength 3.1
Trunk Strength 3.1
Near Vision 3.1
Auditory Attention 3.1
Oral Comprehension 3.0
Oral Expression 3.0
Deductive Reasoning 3.0
Category Flexibility 3.0
Perceptual Speed 3.0
Visualization 3.0
Response Orientation 3.0
Rate Control 3.0
Depth Perception 3.0
Speech Clarity 3.0
Inductive Reasoning 2.9
Flexibility of Closure 2.9
Extent Flexibility 2.9

Knowledge

Production and Processing 3.3

Essential skills

Monitoring 3.1
Active Listening 3.0
Speaking 3.0
Critical Thinking 2.9

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Autodesk AutoCAD Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft Windows Operating system software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
SAP software Enterprise resource planning ERP software Hot technology
HAISEN SoftWare System Industrial control software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.7
Spend Time Standing 4.4
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.4
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.3
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 4.1
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 4.0
Time Pressure 3.9
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 3.7
Exposed to Contaminants 3.7
Spend Time Walking or Running 3.6
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.5
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 3.5
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.4
Contact With Others 3.4
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.3
Consequence of Error 3.3
Physical Proximity 3.2
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 3.1
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.1
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 2.8
Exposed to Minor Burns, Cuts, Bites, or Stings 2.8
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 2.8
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 2.8
Frequency of Decision Making 2.7
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 2.7
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.6
Degree of Automation 2.6
Conflict Situations 2.5
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 2.4
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 2.3
Health and Safety of Other Workers 2.3
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 2.1
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 2.1
Level of Competition 2.1
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 2.1
Exposed to High Places 2.0
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 2.0
Telephone Conversations 1.9
Spend Time Sitting 1.8
In an Open Vehicle or Operating Equipment 1.8

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
High school diploma or equivalent · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 67.7%
Less than a High School Diploma 32.3%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 6.4
Conventional 4.5
Enterprising 1.6
Investigative 1.6
Artistic 1.5

Interest areas

Mechanics/Electronics 3.3
Physical/Manual Labor 3.0
Transportation/Machine Operation 2.0
Engineering 1.9
Construction/Woodwork 1.5
Applied Arts and Design 1.5
Management/Administration 1.3
Information Technology 1.3

Work styles

Cautiousness 2.2
Dependability 2.1
Attention to Detail 1.7

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$27k10th$32k25th$38kMedian$44k75th$49k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
9k20248k2034 (proj.)-11.7% · Declining
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $27,230
25th percentile $32,380
Median (50th) $37,940
75th percentile $43,710
90th percentile $49,080
People employed 8,960

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Manufacturing · Sector 7,420 $38,030
Wholesale Trade · Sector 690 $38,910
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 220 $37,940
Temporary Help Services · National industry 190 $37,940
Retail Trade · Sector 170 $37,290
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 160 $28,200
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 140 $37,500
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 70 $37,500
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector $31,200

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Manufacturing · Sector 10× 7,420
Wholesale Trade · Sector 1.97× 690
Temporary Help Services · National industry 1.23× 190
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 0.62× 160
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 0.42× 220
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 0.33× 140
Retail Trade · Sector 0.19× 170

Part of the Advanced Manufacturing career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders sits at the 24th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 9th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders Machine Feeders and Offbearers Cutting, Punching, and Press Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic Paper Goods Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders Milling and Planing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders show 24th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 1,000 annual U.S. openings

  • Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders rank in the 24th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 1,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be declining (-11.7%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $37,940, across about 8,960 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 27% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders show 24th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 1,000 annual U.S. openings

• Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders rank in the 24th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 1,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be declining (-11.7%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $37,940, across about 8,960 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 27% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6062-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6062-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6062-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-51-6062-00,
  title  = {Textile Cutting Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-51-6062-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.