Label making software
Technology category · O*NET
Label making software is a technology category in the O*NET database. Across U.S. occupations, 11 report using software or tools in this category. The named products below are the specific examples O*NET records for those jobs. The occupations that use it sit, on average, at the 44th percentile of AI task-exposure ( moderate) — how much that work overlaps with what AI can do, not a sign the tool is being replaced. See where every tool category sits.
A Hot tag marks technologies O*NET sees frequently in employer job postings; In demand marks tools an occupation specifically requires.
Example software & tools
Ranked by how many occupations list each product. Each number is an occupation count — a job is counted once per product — so the product rows overlap and do not sum to the category total.
| Software / tool | Occupations | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| Brady Specimen Labeling System | 2 | |
| Label printing software | 2 | |
| Label-making software | 2 | |
| Labeling software | 2 | |
| Specimen labeling system software | 2 | |
| ABOL Manifest Systems | 1 | |
| Barcode labeling software | 1 | |
| Endicia Internet Postage | 1 | |
| Inspection marking systems | 1 | |
| Laser Substrates PostalXport | 1 | |
| RxKinetics UD Labels for Windows | 1 |
Occupations that use Label making software
- Histology Technicians
- Histotechnologists
- Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers
- Naturopathic Physicians
- Packaging and Filling Machine Operators and Tenders
- Pharmacists
- Pharmacy Technicians
- Print Binding and Finishing Workers
- Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks
- Transportation, Storage, and Distribution Managers
- Veterinary Assistants and Laboratory Animal Caretakers
How AI is used by roles that use Label making software
A software category is not itself "being automated" — but we can look at the roles that report using Label making software and ask how those people actually use AI. This rolls the Anthropic Economic Index per-role signal up across those roles, weighted by how much observed AI activity each one has. 45.5% of the 11 roles that use this category carry observed AI-usage data (5 roles).
Across those roles, 62.8% of AI conversations are people working with AI and 25.7% hand a task to AI , with an average autonomy of 3.43 / 5.
| Collaboration pattern | Share | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| learning | 51.7% | you ask AI to explain or teach |
| directive | 20.6% | AI does it; you give the instruction |
| task iteration | 7.1% | you and AI go back and forth |
| feedback loop | 5.0% | AI does it, then adjusts from your feedback |
| validation | 4.0% | you do it; AI checks your work |
Roles behind this signal
The roles using this category that have the most AEI data. "Works with AI" is the role's share of conversations that augment rather than automate.
| Occupation | Works with AI | Autonomy |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacists | 73.9% | 3.5/5 |
| Veterinary Assistants and Laboratory Animal Caretakers | 54.2% | 3.5/5 |
| Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers | 33.3% | 3.0/5 |
| Pharmacy Technicians | — | 3.0/5 |
| Shipping, Receiving, and Traffic Clerks | 50.8% | 4.0/5 |
Source: Anthropic Economic Index (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) over a sample of Claude.ai Free and Pro conversations — not all AI tools and not the whole workforce. Roles list software categories in O*NET; this does not mean AI is used inside Label making software, only that people in those roles use AI. Some conversations are left unclassified, so shares need not sum to 100.
Industries that concentrate this
Where Label making software matters most across the economy. Employment reach is the share of an industry's workers in occupations that significantly use Label making software (O*NET importance ≥ 3 of 5, or report using the tool category). Concentration compares that reach to the national average industry, so a value above 1× means the requirement is more pervasive here than across the economy as a whole.
Nationally, about 2.1% of workers are in occupations that significantly use Label making software (measured across 56 industries).
Sectors with the most such workers
| Sector | Workers | Employment reach |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | 974,230 | 7.6% |
| Retail Trade | 727,820 | 4.7% |
| Health Care and Social Assistance | 253,900 | 1.1% |
| Wholesale Trade | 248,560 | 4.1% |
| Transportation and Warehousing | 235,930 | 3.2% |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services | 187,210 | 1.7% |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services | 157,380 | 1.7% |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises | 38,940 | 1.4% |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) | 24,130 | 0.5% |
| Construction | 21,330 | 0.3% |
| Educational Services | 17,980 | 0.1% |
| Finance and Insurance | 15,120 | 0.2% |
Industries where it is most concentrated
| Industry | Level | Concentration | Employment reach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacies and Drug Retailers | National industry | 26.05× | 54.7% |
| Veterinary Services | National industry | 10.52× | 22.1% |
| Testing Laboratories and Services | National industry | 6.76× | 14.2% |
| Manufacturing | Sector | 3.62× | 7.6% |
| Machine Shops | National industry | 2.71× | 5.7% |
| Retail Trade | Sector | 2.24× | 4.7% |
| Wholesale Trade | Sector | 1.95× | 4.1% |
| Temporary Help Services | National industry | 1.71× | 3.6% |
| Transportation and Warehousing | Sector | 1.52× | 3.2% |
| Sporting Goods Retailers | National industry | 1.29× | 2.7% |
| Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting | Sector | 1.24× | 2.6% |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services | Sector | 0.81× | 1.7% |
Reach is a measure of how widespread a requirement is across an industry's workforce, not how intensively any individual uses it. Sector worker counts come from BLS OEWS employment; the significance threshold and tool use come from O*NET. Industries shown by concentration are filtered to a real worker base so a tiny specialty cannot top the list on rounding.
Sources for this page
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
- O*NET 30.3 U.S. Department of Labor / National Center for O*NET Development
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Census NAICS 2022 U.S. Census Bureau
- Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27) Anthropic
- “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130 OpenAI / academic
- AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans academic
Data compiled June 3, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Cite this page
Singulariki. "Label making software." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; Census NAICS 2022; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/tools/label-making-software
Singulariki. (2026). Label making software. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/tools/label-making-software
@misc{singulariki-label-making-software,
title = {Label making software},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; Census NAICS 2022; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/tools/label-making-software}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.