Skip to content
Singulariki

Genetic Counselors

Occupation · SOC 29-9092.00

Assess individual or family risk for a variety of inherited conditions, such as genetic disorders and birth defects. Provide information to other healthcare providers or to individuals and families concerned with the risk of inherited conditions. Advise individuals and families to support informed decisionmaking and coping methods for those at risk. May help conduct research related to genetic conditions or genetic counseling.

Also called: Certified Genetic Counselor · Genetic Counselor · Prenatal and Pediatric Genetic Counselor · Reproductive Genetic Counseling Coordinator · Medical Science Liaison · Cancer Genetic Counselor · Cancer Program Consultant · Chromosomal Disorders Counselor · Clinical Reviewer · Genetic Coordinator · Genetic Counseling Medical Specialist · Genetics Counselor

Job family: Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-29-9092-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. · 0.8%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians. · 1.1%
  • Read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics. · 0.9%
  • Provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance. · 0.4%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. · 100.0% need a human
  • Provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance. · 100.0% need a human
  • Explain diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), ultrasound, fetal blood sampling, and amniocentesis. · 97.4% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

94th-percentile task overlap — yet about 300 openings a year (+9.3% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5194% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 100th 1.5
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High 77th 0.9
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 90th 0.3

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians. 5.4%
Read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics. 1.5%
Explain diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), ultrasound, fetal blood sampling, and amniocentesis. 0.7%
Evaluate or make recommendations for standards of care or clinical operations, ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, ethics, legislation, or policies. 0.5%
Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. 0.3%
Analyze genetic information to identify patients or families at risk for specific disorders or syndromes. 0.3%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook Growing fast · +9.3% by 2034
Projected annual openings 300
Employment 2024 → 2034 4,000 → 4,300

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

20% mean task exposure (2025)
32nd percentile of 427 placed occupations
+3 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Health Professionals Not Elsewhere Classified · 2269 20% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 51.9% working with AI · 20.7% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Learning · you ask AI to explain or teach
Typical AI autonomy 3.5 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 19.6%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians. Learning 1.1%
Read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics. Learning 0.9%
Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. Directive 0.8%
Provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance. Learning 0.4%
Prepare or provide genetics-related educational materials to patients or medical personnel. Learning 0.4%
Explain diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), ultrasound, fetal blood sampling, and amniocentesis. Learning 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. 100.0%
Provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance. 100.0%
Explain diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), ultrasound, fetal blood sampling, and amniocentesis. 97.4%
Read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics. 96.7%
Prepare or provide genetics-related educational materials to patients or medical personnel. 92.3%
Interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians. 77.1%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians.

    From: Interpret laboratory results and communicate findings to patients or physicians. · 1.1% of measured AI use · learning

  • Help me read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics.

    From: Read current literature, talk with colleagues, or participate in professional organizations or conferences to keep abreast of developments in genetics. · 0.9% of measured AI use · learning

  • Help me identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services.

    From: Identify funding sources and write grant proposals for eligible programs or services. · 0.8% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance.

    From: Provide counseling to patient and family members by providing information, education, or reassurance. · 0.4% of measured AI use · learning

Tasks

All 19 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Biology 4.8
Psychology 4.6
Medicine and Dentistry 4.4
Therapy and Counseling 4.3
English Language 4.1
Customer and Personal Service 3.9
Mathematics 3.7
Sociology and Anthropology 3.4
Education and Training 3.4

Abilities

Written Comprehension 4.3
Deductive Reasoning 4.1
Oral Comprehension 4.0
Oral Expression 4.0
Written Expression 4.0
Problem Sensitivity 4.0
Inductive Reasoning 4.0
Information Ordering 3.9
Speech Recognition 3.9
Speech Clarity 3.8
Near Vision 3.4
Fluency of Ideas 3.1
Originality 3.1
Category Flexibility 3.1
Mathematical Reasoning 3.1
Flexibility of Closure 3.1

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 4.1
Active Listening 4.0
Writing 3.9
Speaking 3.9
Critical Thinking 3.9
Active Learning 3.9
Science 3.3
Learning Strategies 3.0

Transferable skills

Complex Problem Solving 4.0
Social Perceptiveness 3.9
Judgment and Decision Making 3.3
Instructing 3.1
Service Orientation 3.1
Systems Analysis 3.1
Time Management 3.1

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Benetech PRA Medical software
BRCAPRO Medical software
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool Medical software
CancerGene Medical software
CyrillicSoftware Cyrillic Medical software
Database software Data base user interface and query software
FileMaker Pro Data base user interface and query software
Ftree Analytical or scientific software
Jurek Software Pedigree-Draw Medical software
Medgen PED Medical software
PedHunter Medical software
PediDraw Medical software
Pedigree drawing and management software Analytical or scientific software
Progeny Software Progeny Clinical Medical software
Prognosis Innovation Healthcare ChartAccess Medical software
SynDiag Medical software
Wageningen MapChart Medical software
Web browser software Internet browser software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Telephone Conversations 5.0
E-Mail 5.0
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 5.0
Written Letters and Memos 4.6
Contact With Others 4.6
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.4
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.3
Spend Time Sitting 4.3
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.2
Frequency of Decision Making 4.0
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.0
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 4.0
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.9
Time Pressure 3.9
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.7
Consequence of Error 3.3
Level of Competition 3.3
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.9
Physical Proximity 2.9
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 2.8
Conflict Situations 2.6
Public Speaking 2.6
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 2.6
Exposed to Disease or Infections 2.5
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.5
Health and Safety of Other Workers 2.4
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 1.9
Spend Time Standing 1.8
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 1.7
Spend Time Walking or Running 1.7
Degree of Automation 1.6
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 1.5
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 1.4
Dealing with Violent or Physically Aggressive People 1.3
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 1.2
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 1.1
Wear Specialized Protective or Safety Equipment such as Breathing Apparatus, Safety Harness, Full Protection Suits, or Radiation Protection 1.1
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 1.1
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 1.1
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 1.1

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 5 — Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Education
Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
Typical entry-level education
Master's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Extensive skill, knowledge, and experience are needed for these occupations. Many require more than five years of experience. For example, surgeons must complete four years of college and an additional five to seven years of specialized medical training to be able to do their job.
Preparation level
SVP (8.0 and above) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Biological and Biomedical Sciences , Health Professions and Related Programs . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Master's Degree 100.0%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Work styles

Attention to Detail 10.0
Integrity 9.0
Cautiousness 8.0
Intellectual Curiosity 7.0
Cooperation 6.0
Social Orientation 5.0
Self-Control 4.0

Interest areas

Health Care Service 6.1
Teaching/Education 6.0
Life Science 5.7
Medical Science 5.7
Professional Advising 5.7
Social Service 5.4

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Investigative 5.9
Social 5.5
Conventional 3.9

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$79k10th$87k25th$99kMedian$113k75th$138k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
4k20244k2034 (proj.)+9.3% · Growing fast
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $78,680
25th percentile $87,060
Median (50th) $98,910
75th percentile $113,220
90th percentile $137,780
People employed 3,510

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 2,900 $99,210
Educational Services · Sector 240 $95,660
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 120 $93,770
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 70 $125,960
Manufacturing · Sector $75,720

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 5.51× 2,900
Educational Services · Sector 0.77× 240
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 0.49× 120

Part of the Healthcare & Human Services career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Genetic Counselors sits at the 94th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 81st percentile of median pay, placed here against 6 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Genetic Counselors Psychiatric Technicians Family Medicine Physicians Clinical Neuropsychologists AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Genetic Counselors — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 32nd percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Genetic Counselors show 94th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 300 annual U.S. openings

  • Genetic Counselors rank in the 94th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 300 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+9.3%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $98,910, across about 3,510 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 52% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Genetic Counselors show 94th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 300 annual U.S. openings

• Genetic Counselors rank in the 94th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 300 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+9.3%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $98,910, across about 3,510 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 52% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Genetic Counselors". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-9092-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Genetic Counselors." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-9092-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Genetic Counselors. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-9092-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-29-9092-00,
  title  = {Genetic Counselors},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-9092-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.