Skills it runs on
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Occupation · SOC 21-1092.00
Provide social services to assist in rehabilitation of law offenders in custody or on probation or parole. Make recommendations for actions involving formulation of rehabilitation plan and treatment of offender, including conditional release and education and employment stipulations.
Also called: Correctional Counselor · Juvenile Probation Officer · Parole Officer (PO) · Probation Officer · Adult Probation Officer · Deputy Probation Officer (DPO) · Parole Agent · Probation Agent · Probation Counselor · Probation and Parole Officer · Adult Probation and Parole Officer · Attendance Officer
Job family: Community and Social Service Occupations
A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch
/roles/role-21-1092-00/context.md directly.
A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Independent published positions, read together — not a forecast.
66th-percentile task overlap — yet about 7,900 openings a year (+2.6% projected, BLS) . What exposure means →
What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.
Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.
| Measure | Rank vs all occupations | Percentile | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate | 61st | 0.5 | |
| LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate | 52nd | 0.6 | |
| AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High | 86th | 0.3 |
OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.2), with simple added tooling (β 0.4), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.6). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.
Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.
A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.
Frey–Osborne probability 0.3 · 37th percentile among occupations · Moderate
Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.
| Outlook | About average · +2.6% by 2034 |
| Projected annual openings | 7,900 |
| Employment 2024 → 2034 | 92,300 → 94,800 |
“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.
The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.
| International occupation (ISCO-08) | Task exposure (2025) | Most tasks fall in |
|---|---|---|
| Social Work and Counselling Professionals · 2635 | 28% | Not exposed |
Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.
All 21 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.
O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
| Oral Expression | 4.1 | |
| Written Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Problem Sensitivity | 4.0 | |
| Deductive Reasoning | 4.0 | |
| Oral Comprehension | 3.9 | |
| Inductive Reasoning | 3.9 | |
| Written Expression | 3.8 | |
| Speech Recognition | 3.8 | |
| Speech Clarity | 3.8 | |
| Near Vision | 3.3 | |
| Information Ordering | 3.0 | |
| Category Flexibility | 3.0 | |
| Selective Attention | 3.0 |
| Active Listening | 4.0 | |
| Speaking | 4.0 | |
| Reading Comprehension | 3.9 | |
| Critical Thinking | 3.9 | |
| Writing | 3.8 | |
| Monitoring | 3.8 | |
| Active Learning | 3.4 |
| Social Perceptiveness | 4.0 | |
| Complex Problem Solving | 3.8 | |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.6 | |
| Time Management | 3.4 | |
| Coordination | 3.1 | |
| Persuasion | 3.1 | |
| Negotiation | 3.1 | |
| Instructing | 3.0 | |
| Service Orientation | 3.0 | |
| Systems Analysis | 2.9 |
Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.
Showing the top 40 of 42.
How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.
What to study: Public Administration and Social Service Professions . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.
Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.
| Bachelor's Degree | 88.0% | |
| Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) | 5.3% | |
| Master's Degree | 2.4% | |
| Post-Secondary Certificate | 1.7% | |
| Some College Courses | 1.7% | |
| High School Diploma | 0.8% |
The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.
| Dependability | 8.0 | |
| Attention to Detail | 7.0 | |
| Integrity | 6.0 | |
| Social Orientation | 5.0 | |
| Self-Control | 4.0 | |
| Stress Tolerance | 3.0 |
| Social Service | 6.3 | |
| Professional Advising | 4.5 | |
| Protective Service | 4.4 | |
| Social Science | 4.2 | |
| Law | 4.0 | |
| Personal Service | 2.9 |
| Social | 5.6 | |
| Conventional | 4.2 | |
| Enterprising | 3.9 | |
| Investigative | 3.4 |
U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)
| 10th percentile | $45,390 |
| 25th percentile | $52,580 |
| Median (50th) | $64,520 |
| 75th percentile | $84,030 |
| 90th percentile | $106,290 |
| People employed | 86,820 |
Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.
| Industry | Workers | National median pay |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 1,570 | $42,220 |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector | 680 | $54,180 |
| Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · National industry | 170 | $42,480 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 90 | $46,800 |
Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).
| Industry | Concentration | Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · National industry | 1.17× | 170 |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector | 0.13× | 680 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 0.12× | 1,570 |
Part of the Public Service & Safety career cluster.
Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.
Options the data surfaces for Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.
Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.
Occupations O*NET rates as related — the nearby moves on the map.
How people typically prepare for this work.
On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 53rd percentile of 427 international occupations.
Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists show 66th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 7,900 annual U.S. openings
Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists show 66th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 7,900 annual U.S. openings • Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists rank in the 66th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE) • The occupation is projected to see about 7,900 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • BLS projects employment to be about average (+2.6%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • Median annual pay is $64,520, across about 86,820 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024)) Source: Singulariki — "Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-21-1092-00 Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Singulariki. "Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-21-1092-00
Singulariki. (2026). Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-21-1092-00
@misc{singulariki-role-21-1092-00,
title = {Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-21-1092-00}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.