Skip to content
Singulariki

Food Service Managers

Occupation · SOC 11-9051.00

Plan, direct, or coordinate activities of an organization or department that serves food and beverages.

Also called: F and B Manager (Food and Beverage Manager) · Food Service Director · Food Service Manager · Restaurant Manager · Banquet Manager · CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) · Catering Manager · Dining Service Director · Food Service Supervisor · Kitchen Manager · Banquet Director · CFPP (Certified Food Protection Professional)

Job family: Management Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-11-9051-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations. · 0.4%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations. · 94.3% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

42nd-percentile task overlap — yet about 42,000 openings a year (+6.4% projected, BLS) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate 45th -0.1
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 61st 0.8
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Low 27th 0.1

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.4), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.8). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.1 · 27th percentile among occupations · Low

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Estimate food, liquor, wine, and other beverage consumption to anticipate amounts to be purchased or requisitioned. 0.7%
Create specialty dishes and develop recipes to be used in dining facilities. 0.3%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +6.4% by 2034
Projected annual openings 42,000
Employment 2024 → 2034 352,800 → 375,300

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

36% mean task exposure (2025)
67th percentile of 427 placed occupations
−6 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Restaurant Managers · 1412 36% Minimal

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 3.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 71.4%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations. Directive 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations. 94.3%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations.

    From: Investigate and resolve complaints regarding food quality, service, or accommodations. · 0.4% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 28 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Customer and Personal Service 4.5
Administration and Management 4.1
Food Production 4.0
English Language 3.5
Personnel and Human Resources 3.5
Sales and Marketing 3.4
Mathematics 3.4
Administrative 3.3
Production and Processing 3.2
Education and Training 3.1
Economics and Accounting 3.0

Essential skills

Active Listening 3.9
Speaking 3.9
Monitoring 3.9
Reading Comprehension 3.8
Critical Thinking 3.6
Active Learning 3.1
Learning Strategies 3.1
Writing 3.0

Transferable skills

Coordination 3.9
Management of Personnel Resources 3.9
Service Orientation 3.8
Social Perceptiveness 3.6
Time Management 3.5
Negotiation 3.1
Instructing 3.1
Judgment and Decision Making 3.1
Persuasion 3.0
Complex Problem Solving 3.0
Systems Analysis 3.0
Systems Evaluation 3.0

Abilities

Oral Comprehension 3.9
Written Comprehension 3.9
Oral Expression 3.9
Problem Sensitivity 3.9
Deductive Reasoning 3.9
Speech Clarity 3.8
Selective Attention 3.1
Near Vision 3.1
Speech Recognition 3.1

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Showing the top 40 of 46.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Facebook Web page creation and editing software Hot technology
Google Docs Word processing software Hot technology
Intuit QuickBooks Accounting software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Project Project management software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Aestiva Employee Time Clock Time accounting software
Apache Groovy Object or component oriented development software
Army Food Management Information System Inventory management software
Aurora FoodPro Analytical or scientific software
ChefDesk Chef's Calculators Analytical or scientific software
ClubSoft Food & Beverage Point of Sale Point of sale POS software
Culinary Software Services ChefTec Analytical or scientific software
Database software Data base user interface and query software
DataTeam Lunch Express Point of sale POS software
Delphi Technology Financial analysis software
Dinerware Intuitive Restaurant Point of sale POS software
espSoftware Employee Schedule Partner Calendar and scheduling software
Evernote Word processing software
Food Service Solutions FoodCo Inventory management software
Food Service Solutions POSitive ID System Point of sale POS software
Food Services Solutions DayCap Accounting software
Gift Certificates Plus Giftworks Inventory management software
Google Drive Cloud-based data access and sharing software
IBM Domino Communications server software
iMagic Restaurant Reservation Calendar and scheduling software
IPro Restaurant Inventory, Recipe & Menu Software Analytical or scientific software
Microsoft Dynamics Enterprise resource planning ERP software
Oracle Taleo Human resources software
ReServe Interactive Project management software
Restaurant Manager Point of sale POS software
SoftCafe MenuPro Desktop publishing software
SweetWARE nutraCoster Analytical or scientific software
ValuSoft MasterCook Data base user interface and query software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 5.0
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.9
Contact With Others 4.8
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.7
Telephone Conversations 4.6
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 4.6
Frequency of Decision Making 4.6
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 4.5
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.5
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 4.5
Spend Time Standing 4.5
Health and Safety of Other Workers 4.2
Physical Proximity 4.2
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.2
Spend Time Walking or Running 4.2
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.1
Time Pressure 4.1
E-Mail 4.1
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.9
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 3.7
Conflict Situations 3.6
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 3.6
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.4
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.2
Exposed to Minor Burns, Cuts, Bites, or Stings 2.8
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 2.8
Consequence of Error 2.8
Written Letters and Memos 2.8
Public Speaking 2.6
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 2.3
Level of Competition 2.3
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.2
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 2.2
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 2.1
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 2.0
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 2.0
Spend Time Sitting 2.0
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 1.9
Dealing with Violent or Physically Aggressive People 1.7
Degree of Automation 1.7

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
High school diploma or equivalent · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Culinary, Entertainment, and Personal Services , Family and Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 29.7%
Post-Secondary Certificate 21.3%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 18.6%
Less than a High School Diploma 16.1%
Bachelor's Degree 9.7%
Some College Courses 4.6%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Interest areas

Management/Administration 6.3
Culinary Art 4.0
Human Resources 3.9
Personal Service 3.9
Accounting 3.6
Business Initiatives 3.0
Sales 2.6
Finance 2.6

Work styles

Dependability 6.0
Attention to Detail 5.0
Cooperation 4.0
Social Orientation 3.0

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Enterprising 6.0
Conventional 5.1
Realistic 4.2
Social 3.5

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$42k10th$53k25th$65kMedian$82k75th$105k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
353k2024375k2034 (proj.)+6.4% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $42,380
25th percentile $53,090
Median (50th) $65,310
75th percentile $82,300
90th percentile $105,420
People employed 244,230

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 208,270 $63,800
Full-Service Restaurants · National industry 87,620 $71,220
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 7,510 $84,990
Educational Services · Sector 6,730 $77,240
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 6,560 $80,200
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 5,870 $78,050
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 2,480 $72,650
Retail Trade · Sector 1,790 $61,340
Casino Hotels · National industry 1,730 $79,300
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 1,030 $72,330
Manufacturing · Sector 960 $68,850
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 930 $73,250

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Full-Service Restaurants · National industry 10.32× 87,620
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 9.24× 208,270
Casino Hotels · National industry 3.24× 1,730
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 1.69× 7,510
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 1.4× 5,870
Educational Services · Sector 0.31× 6,730
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 0.21× 210
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 0.18× 6,560

Part of the Hospitality, Events, & Tourism career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Food Service Managers sits at the 42nd percentile of AI task-overlap and the 55th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Food Service Managers Food Preparation Workers Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria Chefs and Head Cooks Cooks, Private Household First-Line Supervisors of Retail Sales Workers Hosts and Hostesses, Restaurant, Lounge, and Coffee Shop AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Food Service Managers — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 67th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Food Service Managers show 42nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 42,000 annual U.S. openings

  • Food Service Managers rank in the 42nd percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 42,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+6.4%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $65,310, across about 244,230 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
Copy the whole kit
Food Service Managers show 42nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 42,000 annual U.S. openings

• Food Service Managers rank in the 42nd percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 42,000 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+6.4%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $65,310, across about 244,230 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))

Source: Singulariki — "Food Service Managers". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9051-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Food Service Managers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9051-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Food Service Managers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9051-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-11-9051-00,
  title  = {Food Service Managers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9051-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.