Skip to content
Singulariki

Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary

Occupation · SOC 25-1022.00

Teach courses pertaining to mathematical concepts, statistics, and actuarial science and to the application of original and standardized mathematical techniques in solving specific problems and situations. Includes both teachers primarily engaged in teaching and those who do a combination of teaching and research.

Also called: Instructor · Mathematics Instructor (Math Instructor) · Mathematics Professor · Professor · Adjunct Mathematics Instructor · Assistant Professor · Associate Professor · Math Teacher · Mathematical Sciences Professor · Mathematics Lecturer · Actuarial Science Professor · Actuarial Science Teacher

Job family: Educational Instruction and Library Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-25-1022-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Compile, administer, and grade examinations, or assign this work to others. · 10.6%
  • Prepare course materials such as syllabi, homework assignments, and handouts. · 3.8%
  • Compile bibliographies of specialized materials for outside reading assignments. · 2.9%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Evaluate and grade students' class work, assignments, and papers. · 25.7%
  • Advise students on academic and vocational curricula and on career issues. · 23.7%
  • Provide professional consulting services to government or industry. · 12.8%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Select and obtain materials and supplies such as textbooks. · 100.0% need a human
  • Maintain regularly scheduled office hours to advise and assist students. · 100.0% need a human
  • Collaborate with colleagues to address teaching and research issues. · 100.0% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

83rd-percentile task overlap — yet about 4,400 openings a year (+2.3% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 6504% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 90th 1.3
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 63rd 0.8
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 87th 0.3

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.3), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.8). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Evaluate and grade students' class work, assignments, and papers. 17.5%
Plan, evaluate, and revise curricula, course content, and course materials and methods of instruction. 8.5%
Conduct research in a particular field of knowledge and publish findings in books, professional journals, or electronic media. 8.3%
Compile, administer, and grade examinations, or assign this work to others. 7.0%
Initiate, facilitate, and moderate classroom discussions. 6.6%
Compile bibliographies of specialized materials for outside reading assignments. 3.0%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +2.3% by 2034
Projected annual openings 4,400
Employment 2024 → 2034 58,900 → 60,200

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

37% mean task exposure (2025)
70th percentile of 427 placed occupations
+5 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
University and Higher Education Teachers · 2310 37% Minimal

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 65.0% working with AI · 31.6% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Iteration · you and AI go back and forth
Typical AI autonomy 3.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 33.4%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Evaluate and grade students' class work, assignments, and papers. Validation 25.7%
Advise students on academic and vocational curricula and on career issues. Iteration 23.7%
Provide professional consulting services to government or industry. Iteration 12.8%
Compile, administer, and grade examinations, or assign this work to others. Directive 10.6%
Prepare course materials such as syllabi, homework assignments, and handouts. Directive 3.8%
Compile bibliographies of specialized materials for outside reading assignments. Directive 2.9%
Initiate, facilitate, and moderate classroom discussions. Learning 2.6%
Plan, evaluate, and revise curricula, course content, and course materials and methods of instruction. Iteration 2.2%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Select and obtain materials and supplies such as textbooks. 100.0%
Maintain regularly scheduled office hours to advise and assist students. 100.0%
Collaborate with colleagues to address teaching and research issues. 100.0%
Participate in campus and community events. 100.0%
Write grant proposals to procure external research funding. 100.0%
Serve on academic or administrative committees that deal with institutional policies, departmental matters, and academic issues. 100.0%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me evaluate and grade students' class work, assignments, and papers.

    From: Evaluate and grade students' class work, assignments, and papers. · 25.7% of measured AI use · validation

  • Help me advise students on academic and vocational curricula and on career issues.

    From: Advise students on academic and vocational curricula and on career issues. · 23.7% of measured AI use · task iteration

  • Help me provide professional consulting services to government or industry.

    From: Provide professional consulting services to government or industry. · 12.8% of measured AI use · task iteration

  • Help me compile, administer, and grade examinations, or assign this work to others.

    From: Compile, administer, and grade examinations, or assign this work to others. · 10.6% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 24 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Emerging tasks

Newer responsibilities O*NET has flagged as growing for this occupation.

  • Hire adjunct faculty.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Mathematics 4.9
Education and Training 4.2
English Language 3.8
Computers and Electronics 3.4

Essential skills

Mathematics 4.3
Speaking 4.1
Reading Comprehension 4.0
Active Listening 4.0
Writing 3.9
Critical Thinking 3.9
Learning Strategies 3.9
Monitoring 3.9
Active Learning 3.8

Abilities

Mathematical Reasoning 4.3
Oral Expression 4.1
Number Facility 4.1
Oral Comprehension 4.0
Written Comprehension 4.0
Deductive Reasoning 4.0
Written Expression 3.9
Inductive Reasoning 3.9
Speech Clarity 3.9
Near Vision 3.8
Speech Recognition 3.5
Information Ordering 3.4
Fluency of Ideas 3.1
Originality 3.1
Problem Sensitivity 3.1
Category Flexibility 3.0
Memorization 3.0
Selective Attention 2.9

Transferable skills

Instructing 4.0
Complex Problem Solving 3.6
Judgment and Decision Making 3.3
Systems Evaluation 3.1
Time Management 3.1
Social Perceptiveness 3.0
Coordination 3.0
Service Orientation 3.0
Systems Analysis 2.9

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Showing the top 40 of 41.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Google Docs Word processing software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Visual Basic Development environment software Hot technology
Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications VBA Development environment software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
SAS Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
Structured query language SQL Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Learning management system LMS Computer based training software In demand
Blackboard Learn Computer based training software
Blackboard software Data base user interface and query software
Collaborative editing software Word processing software
Course management system software Computer based training software
Desire2Learn LMS software Computer based training software
Desmos Analytical or scientific software
DOC Cop Information retrieval or search software
Email software Electronic mail software
Geogebra Analytical or scientific software
Image scanning software Optical character reader OCR or scanning software
iParadigms Turnitin Information retrieval or search software
Moodle Computer based training software
Sakai CLE Computer based training software
Web browser software Internet browser software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

E-Mail 4.9
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.7
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.6
Public Speaking 4.5
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.3
Contact With Others 4.3
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.0
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.9
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.7
Time Pressure 3.6
Frequency of Decision Making 3.5
Physical Proximity 3.3
Level of Competition 3.3
Spend Time Sitting 3.3
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 3.2
Written Letters and Memos 3.2
Spend Time Standing 3.1
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.1
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.0
Telephone Conversations 2.9
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.6
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 2.5
Conflict Situations 2.4
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 2.2
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.2
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.2
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 2.2
Spend Time Walking or Running 2.0
Health and Safety of Other Workers 1.7
Exposed to Contaminants 1.6
Degree of Automation 1.6
Exposed to Disease or Infections 1.6
Consequence of Error 1.4
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 1.4
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 1.3
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 1.3
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 1.2
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 1.2
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 1.2
Dealing with Violent or Physically Aggressive People 1.2

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 5 — Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Education
Most of these occupations require graduate school. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D. (law degree).
Typical entry-level education
Doctoral or professional degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Extensive skill, knowledge, and experience are needed for these occupations. Many require more than five years of experience. For example, surgeons must complete four years of college and an additional five to seven years of specialized medical training to be able to do their job.
Preparation level
SVP (8.0 and above) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Biological and Biomedical Sciences , Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Education , Mathematics and Statistics , Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies , Philosophy and Religious Studies . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Master's Degree 43.0%
Doctoral Degree 36.8%
Post-Doctoral Training 10.4%
Bachelor's Degree 9.3%
Post-Baccalaureate Certificate 0.6%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Interest areas

Teaching/Education 6.8
Mathematics/Statistics 5.9
Public Speaking 4.9
Professional Advising 4.3
Social Service 2.6
Information Technology 2.3
Human Resources 2.2
Management/Administration 2.2

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Social 6.2
Investigative 5.9
Conventional 4.4
Artistic 3.2
Realistic 2.8

Work styles

Dependability 4.0
Attention to Detail 3.0
Intellectual Curiosity 2.7

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$48k10th$61k25th$79kMedian$106k75th$161k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
59k202460k2034 (proj.)+2.3% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $48,150
25th percentile $60,880
Median (50th) $79,350
75th percentile $106,270
90th percentile $161,020
People employed 48,820

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Educational Services · Sector 48,760 $79,350

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Educational Services · Sector 11.29× 48,760

Part of the Education career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary sits at the 83rd percentile of AI task-overlap and the 69th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary Teaching Assistants, Postsecondary Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary Education Teachers, Postsecondary Economics Teachers, Postsecondary Tutors AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary show 83rd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 4,400 annual U.S. openings

  • Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary rank in the 83rd percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 4,400 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+2.3%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $79,350, across about 48,820 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 65% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary show 83rd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 4,400 annual U.S. openings

• Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary rank in the 83rd percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 4,400 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+2.3%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $79,350, across about 48,820 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 65% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-25-1022-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-25-1022-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-25-1022-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-25-1022-00,
  title  = {Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-25-1022-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.