Skip to content
Singulariki

Photonics Technicians

Occupation · SOC 17-3029.08

Build, install, test, or maintain optical or fiber optic equipment, such as lasers, lenses, or mirrors, using spectrometers, interferometers, or related equipment.

Also called: Fiber Optics Instructor · Laser Technician (Laser Tech) · Optics Technician (Optics Tech) · Photonics Technician (Photonics Tech) · Fiber Optics Technician (Fiber Optics Tech) · Optomechanical Technician (Optomechanical Tech) · Photonics Laboratory Technician (Photonics Lab Tech) · Ruling Technician (Ruling Tech) · Certified Laser Technician (Certified Laser Tech) · Electro-Optics Technician (Electro-Optics Tech) · Fiber Optics Assembler · Fiber Optics Cabling Specialist

Job family: Architecture and Engineering Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-17-3029-08/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. · 0.4%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. · 87.5% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

52nd-percentile task overlap — yet about 5,700 openings a year (+1.5% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 6000% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate 53rd 0.2
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 37th 0.4
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 69th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.2), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.4). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.2 · 36th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Compute or record photonic test data. 0.7%
Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. 0.6%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +1.5% by 2034
Projected annual openings 5,700
Employment 2024 → 2034 67,300 → 68,300

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international 4 occupations below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

28% mean task exposure (2025)
52nd percentile of 427 placed occupations
−6 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Chemical Engineering Technicians · 3116 32% Not exposed
Mining and metallurgical technicians · 3117 28% Not exposed
Mechanical Engineering Technicians · 3115 26% Not exposed
Physical and Engineering Science Technicians Not Elsewhere Classified · 3119 26% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 60.0% working with AI · — handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Learning · you ask AI to explain or teach
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. Learning 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. 87.5%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments.

    From: Assist scientists or engineers in the conduct of photonic experiments. · 0.4% of measured AI use · learning

Tasks

All 30 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Engineering and Technology 3.9
Computers and Electronics 3.8
Mathematics 3.5
Mechanical 3.4
Production and Processing 3.2
English Language 3.2
Physics 3.2
Customer and Personal Service 3.0

Abilities

Near Vision 3.8
Oral Comprehension 3.6
Problem Sensitivity 3.6
Written Comprehension 3.5
Information Ordering 3.4
Finger Dexterity 3.4
Oral Expression 3.3
Written Expression 3.3
Deductive Reasoning 3.3
Perceptual Speed 3.3
Inductive Reasoning 3.1
Category Flexibility 3.1
Visualization 3.1
Arm-Hand Steadiness 3.1
Manual Dexterity 3.1
Control Precision 3.1

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 3.5
Active Listening 3.4
Critical Thinking 3.4
Active Learning 3.3
Monitoring 3.3
Writing 3.1
Speaking 3.1

Transferable skills

Operations Monitoring 3.4
Quality Control Analysis 3.4
Equipment Maintenance 3.3
Complex Problem Solving 3.1
Troubleshooting 3.1
Coordination 3.0
Repairing 3.0
Judgment and Decision Making 3.0
Time Management 3.0

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Autodesk AutoCAD Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Facebook Web page creation and editing software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
SAP software Enterprise resource planning ERP software Hot technology
The MathWorks MATLAB Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
Data acquisition software Analytical or scientific software
Database software Data base user interface and query software
Image processing software Graphics or photo imaging software
National Instruments LabVIEW Development environment software
Statistical analysis software Analytical or scientific software
Web browser software Internet browser software
ZEMAX Optical Design Program Computer aided design CAD software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

E-Mail 4.7
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.6
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.5
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 4.2
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.2
Telephone Conversations 4.0
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.0
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.0
Contact With Others 3.9
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.8
Time Pressure 3.8
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.8
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 3.6
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 3.5
Consequence of Error 3.5
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.5
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.4
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 3.3
Spend Time Standing 3.3
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.2
Physical Proximity 3.2
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.1
Exposed to Contaminants 3.1
Frequency of Decision Making 3.1
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.0
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 3.0
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.9
Level of Competition 2.8
Spend Time Sitting 2.8
Exposed to Minor Burns, Cuts, Bites, or Stings 2.7
Written Letters and Memos 2.7
Degree of Automation 2.6
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 2.5
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 2.5
Conflict Situations 2.5
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 2.5
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.4
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 2.4
Spend Time Walking or Running 2.4
Wear Specialized Protective or Safety Equipment such as Breathing Apparatus, Safety Harness, Full Protection Suits, or Radiation Protection 2.3

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 3 — Job Zone Three: Medium Preparation Needed
Education
Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's degree.
Typical entry-level education
Associate's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Previous work-related skill, knowledge, or experience is required for these occupations. For example, an electrician must have completed three or four years of apprenticeship or several years of vocational training, and often must have passed a licensing exam, in order to perform the job.
Preparation level
SVP (6.0 to < 7.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Engineering/Engineering-Related Technologies/Technicians , Military Technologies and Applied Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 40.9%
High School Diploma 27.3%
Bachelor's Degree 13.6%
Post-Secondary Certificate 9.1%
Some College Courses 4.5%
Master's Degree 4.5%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 7.0
Conventional 5.5
Investigative 4.2

Interest areas

Engineering 6.2
Mechanics/Electronics 6.1
Physical Science 5.0
Mathematics/Statistics 3.1
Information Technology 2.9
Physical/Manual Labor 2.2
Office Work 1.6

Work styles

Dependability 3.0
Attention to Detail 2.7
Cautiousness 2.0
Intellectual Curiosity 1.9
Integrity 1.6
Perseverance 1.6

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$47k10th$60k25th$77kMedian$98k75th$115k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
67k202468k2034 (proj.)+1.5% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $47,010
25th percentile $59,700
Median (50th) $77,390
75th percentile $97,760
90th percentile $114,630
People employed 64,410

Wages and employment are reported by BLS for the broader occupation group this specialty belongs to (SOC 17-3029), not for the specialty alone.

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 19,500 $70,520
Manufacturing · Sector 17,150 $68,010
Engineering Services · National industry 4,810 $65,790
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 4,580 $63,340
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 1,460 $66,920
Educational Services · Sector 1,380 $63,000
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 1,360 $77,840
Temporary Help Services · National industry 1,040 $65,360
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 1,030 $83,620
Wholesale Trade · Sector 950 $66,870
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction · Sector 750 $86,450
Utilities · Sector 730 $100,100

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 64.34× 4,580
Engineering Services · National industry 9.96× 4,810
Nuclear Electric Power Generation · National industry 6.45× 100
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · National industry 4.37× 130
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 4.33× 19,500
Manufacturing · Sector 3.22× 17,150
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction · Sector 3.13× 750
Utilities · Sector 3.02× 730

Part of the Advanced Manufacturing , Arts, Entertainment, & Design , Construction , Energy & Natural Resources , Public Service & Safety and Supply Chain & Transportation career clusters.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Photonics Technicians sits at the 52nd percentile of AI task-overlap and the 66th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Photonics Technicians Medical Equipment Repairers Robotics Technicians Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologists and Technicians Calibration Technologists and Technicians Photonics Engineers AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Photonics Technicians — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 52nd percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Photonics Technicians show 52nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,700 annual U.S. openings

  • Photonics Technicians rank in the 52nd percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 5,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+1.5%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $77,390, across about 64,410 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 60% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Photonics Technicians show 52nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,700 annual U.S. openings

• Photonics Technicians rank in the 52nd percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 5,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+1.5%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $77,390, across about 64,410 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 60% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Photonics Technicians". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-08
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Photonics Technicians." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-08

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Photonics Technicians. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-08

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-17-3029-08,
  title  = {Photonics Technicians},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-08}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.