Skip to content
Singulariki

Agricultural Engineers

Occupation · SOC 17-2021.00

Apply knowledge of engineering technology and biological science to agricultural problems concerned with power and machinery, electrification, structures, soil and water conservation, and processing of agricultural products.

Also called: Agricultural Engineer · Engineer · Project Engineer · Research Agricultural Engineer · Agricultural Systems Specialist · Conservation Engineer · Field Engineer · Product Engineer · Product Technology Scientist · Research Engineer · Agricultural Equipment Design Engineer · Agricultural Equipment Test Engineer

Job family: Architecture and Engineering Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-17-2021-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. · 1.0%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. · 0.4%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. · 97.5% need a human
  • Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. · 97.1% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

61st-percentile task overlap — yet about 100 openings a year (+5.9% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5525% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 72nd 0.9
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 62nd 0.8
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 52nd 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.4), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.8). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.5 · 47th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. 1.4%
Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. 0.6%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +5.9% by 2034
Projected annual openings 100
Employment 2024 → 2034 1,700 → 1,800

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

32% mean task exposure (2025)
61st percentile of 427 placed occupations
+2 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Mechanical Engineers · 2144 32% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 55.3% working with AI · 24.5% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Iteration · you and AI go back and forth
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 38.5%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. Directive 1.0%
Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. Iteration 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. 97.5%
Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. 97.1%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity.

    From: Conduct educational programs that provide farmers or farm cooperative members with information that can help them improve agricultural productivity. · 1.0% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems.

    From: Prepare reports, sketches, working drawings, specifications, proposals, and budgets for proposed sites or systems. · 0.4% of measured AI use · task iteration

Tasks

All 14 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Emerging tasks

Newer responsibilities O*NET has flagged as growing for this occupation.

  • Communicate results in peer-reviewed research articles or at workshops or conferences.
  • Use agricultural drones for crop monitoring, irrigation management, and pest control.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Engineering and Technology 4.8
Computers and Electronics 4.5
Design 4.3
Mathematics 4.3
Physics 4.3
Biology 4.1
Mechanical 3.9
English Language 3.9
Food Production 3.6
Chemistry 3.6
Production and Processing 3.5
Building and Construction 3.4

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 4.0
Active Listening 4.0
Writing 4.0
Speaking 4.0
Critical Thinking 3.9
Mathematics 3.8
Science 3.4
Active Learning 3.3

Abilities

Oral Comprehension 4.0
Written Comprehension 4.0
Oral Expression 4.0
Written Expression 4.0
Deductive Reasoning 4.0
Inductive Reasoning 4.0
Problem Sensitivity 3.9
Information Ordering 3.8
Category Flexibility 3.8
Visualization 3.6
Near Vision 3.6
Speech Clarity 3.6
Fluency of Ideas 3.5
Speech Recognition 3.5
Originality 3.4
Mathematical Reasoning 3.4

Transferable skills

Complex Problem Solving 3.9
Judgment and Decision Making 3.9
Systems Evaluation 3.9
Systems Analysis 3.8

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Showing the top 40 of 44.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Adobe InDesign Desktop publishing software Hot technology
Adobe Photoshop Graphics or photo imaging software Hot technology
Autodesk AutoCAD Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Project Project management software Hot technology
Microsoft SharePoint Document management software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Oracle Database Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Oracle Java Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
SAP software Enterprise resource planning ERP software Hot technology
SAS Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
Eagle Point LANDCADD Computer aided design CAD software
ESRI ArcView Geographic information system
PTC Creo Parametric Computer aided design CAD software
PTC Pro/Pipe Computer aided design CAD software
Supervisory control and data acquisition SCADA software Industrial control software
Web browser software Internet browser software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

E-Mail 5.0
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.5
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.3
Telephone Conversations 4.2
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.2
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.2
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.0
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 4.0
Contact With Others 3.8
Spend Time Sitting 3.7
Written Letters and Memos 3.5
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 3.5
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.5
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.5
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 3.5
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.5
Outdoors, Under Cover 3.4
Time Pressure 3.4
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 3.4
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 3.3
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 3.3
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 3.1
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 3.0
Consequence of Error 3.0
Level of Competition 3.0
Frequency of Decision Making 3.0
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 2.9
Physical Proximity 2.9
In an Open Vehicle or Operating Equipment 2.8
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 2.8
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 2.7
Exposed to Contaminants 2.6
Conflict Situations 2.6
Spend Time Standing 2.5
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 2.4
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 2.4
Public Speaking 2.3
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.3
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 2.3
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 2.3

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 4 — Job Zone Four: Considerable Preparation Needed
Education
Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not.
Typical entry-level education
Bachelor's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
A considerable amount of work-related skill, knowledge, or experience is needed for these occupations. For example, an accountant must complete four years of college and work for several years in accounting to be considered qualified.
Preparation level
SVP (7.0 to < 8.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Engineering . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Bachelor's Degree 75.0%
Master's Degree 10.0%
Doctoral Degree 10.0%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 5.0%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 6.7
Investigative 6.3
Conventional 3.8

Interest areas

Engineering 6.4
Agriculture 5.3
Physical Science 5.0
Nature/Outdoors 4.8
Mechanics/Electronics 4.7
Life Science 3.9
Mathematics/Statistics 3.5
Information Technology 2.8
Management/Administration 2.7
Construction/Woodwork 2.6
Transportation/Machine Operation 2.6

Work styles

Dependability 4.0
Attention to Detail 3.0

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$43k10th$50k25th$85kMedian$104k75th$133k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
2k20242k2034 (proj.)+5.9% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $43,020
25th percentile $49,930
Median (50th) $84,630
75th percentile $103,940
90th percentile $132,700
People employed 1,680

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 770
Educational Services · Sector 200 $84,630
Manufacturing · Sector 130 $99,350
Wholesale Trade · Sector 70 $75,820
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting · Sector $75,760
Engineering Services · National industry $104,690

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 6.56× 770
Educational Services · Sector 1.35× 200
Manufacturing · Sector 0.93× 130

Part of the Agriculture career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Agricultural Engineers sits at the 61st percentile of AI task-overlap and the 74th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Agricultural Engineers Agricultural Technicians Biofuels Production Managers Conservation Scientists Biofuels/Biodiesel Technology and Product Development Managers Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians Industrial Ecologists Water/Wastewater Engineers Environmental Engineers AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Agricultural Engineers — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 61st percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Agricultural Engineers show 61st-percentile AI task overlap — and about 100 annual U.S. openings

  • Agricultural Engineers rank in the 61st percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 100 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+5.9%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $84,630, across about 1,680 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 55% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Agricultural Engineers show 61st-percentile AI task overlap — and about 100 annual U.S. openings

• Agricultural Engineers rank in the 61st percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 100 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+5.9%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $84,630, across about 1,680 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 55% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Agricultural Engineers". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-2021-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Agricultural Engineers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-2021-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Agricultural Engineers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-2021-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-17-2021-00,
  title  = {Agricultural Engineers},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-2021-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.