Skip to content
Singulariki

Philosophy and Theology

Knowledge · O*NET work requirement

Knowledge of different philosophical systems and religions. This includes their basic principles, values, ethics, ways of thinking, customs, practices, and their impact on human culture.

In the O*NET occupational database, Philosophy and Theology is an area of knowledge that work requires. O*NET rates how important it is (1–5) and what level of it a job needs (0–7) for every U.S. occupation. It is rated as important (3 or higher) in 28 of 894 occupations.

Breadth here means how widely O*NET rates this area of knowledge as important across occupations — not that it is rare, high-paying, or currently in employer demand.

Occupations that rely most on Philosophy and Theology

Ranked by O*NET importance to the occupation (1–5). Bars are sized against the 1–5 scale; the level column is what depth of the area of knowledge the job needs (0–7).

Occupation Importance Score Level
Philosophy and Religion Teachers, Postsecondary 4.8 6.7
Clergy 4.7 6.3
Directors, Religious Activities and Education 4.2 5.4
Middle School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education 3.8 4.7
English Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.7 5.6
Anthropology and Archeology Teachers, Postsecondary 3.6 4.8
Communications Teachers, Postsecondary 3.5 5.4
Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary 3.5 5.6
History Teachers, Postsecondary 3.4 5.7
Substance Abuse and Behavioral Disorder Counselors 3.3 4.0
Foreign Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.3 4.3
Art, Drama, and Music Teachers, Postsecondary 3.2 4.4
Instructional Coordinators 3.2 3.6
Art Therapists 3.2 4.2
Marriage and Family Therapists 3.2 4.0
Anthropologists and Archeologists 3.1 4.8
Healthcare Social Workers 3.1 4.4
Sociologists 3.1 5.2
Music Directors and Composers 3.1 3.6
Political Scientists 3.1 4.6
Embalmers 3.1 4.2
Area, Ethnic, and Cultural Studies Teachers, Postsecondary 3.1 4.7
Morticians, Undertakers, and Funeral Arrangers 3.1 2.9
Education Teachers, Postsecondary 3.0 4.6
Psychiatrists 3.0 4.1
Political Science Teachers, Postsecondary 3.0 4.5
Curators 3.0 4.0
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers 3.0 3.3
Mental Health Counselors 3.0 4.0
Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education 2.9 3.5
Health Education Specialists 2.9 3.6
Special Education Teachers, Preschool 2.9 2.8
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physicians 2.9 3.7
Music Therapists 2.9 3.5
Psychology Teachers, Postsecondary 2.9 4.5
Occupational Therapists 2.8 3.3
Family and Consumer Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary 2.8 3.8
Special Education Teachers, Middle School 2.8 3.4
Advanced Practice Psychiatric Nurses 2.8 3.8
First-Line Supervisors of Correctional Officers 2.7 3.2

How AI is used by roles that need Philosophy and Theology

This area of knowledge is not itself "being automated" — but we can look at the roles for which O*NET rates it important and ask how those people actually use AI. This rolls the Anthropic Economic Index per-role signal up across those roles (importance-weighted). 85.7% of the 28 roles where this is important carry observed AI-usage data (24 roles).

Across those roles, 61.6% of AI conversations are people working with AI and 31.0% hand a task to AI , with an average autonomy of 3.74 / 5.

Collaboration pattern Share What it means
task iteration 29.6% you and AI go back and forth
directive 29.3% AI does it; you give the instruction
learning 23.9% you ask AI to explain or teach
validation 8.1% you do it; AI checks your work
feedback loop 1.7% AI does it, then adjusts from your feedback

Roles behind this signal

The roles where this area of knowledge is most important and that also have the most AEI data. "Works with AI" is the role's share of conversations that augment rather than automate.

Occupation Importance Works with AI Autonomy
English Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.7 63.2% 4.0/5
Philosophy and Religion Teachers, Postsecondary 4.8 66.8% 3.3/5
Foreign Language and Literature Teachers, Postsecondary 3.3 65.2% 3.0/5
Communications Teachers, Postsecondary 3.5 65.7% 3.0/5
Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary 3.5 66.2% 3.5/5
History Teachers, Postsecondary 3.4 65.1% 3.5/5
Instructional Coordinators 3.2 53.1% 4.0/5
Education Teachers, Postsecondary 3.0 65.3% 3.5/5
Political Science Teachers, Postsecondary 3.0 65.7% 3.3/5
Art, Drama, and Music Teachers, Postsecondary 3.2 66.1% 4.0/5
Anthropology and Archeology Teachers, Postsecondary 3.6 63.1% 4.0/5
Area, Ethnic, and Cultural Studies Teachers, Postsecondary 3.1 62.5% 3.5/5

Source: Anthropic Economic Index (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) over a sample of Claude.ai Free and Pro conversations — not all AI tools and not the whole workforce. Shares are of observed conversations, weighted by how important this area of knowledge is to each role; some conversations are left unclassified by Anthropic's taxonomy, so shares need not sum to 100.

Industries that concentrate this

Where Philosophy and Theology matters most across the economy. Employment reach is the share of an industry's workers in occupations that significantly rely on Philosophy and Theology (O*NET importance ≥ 3 of 5). Concentration compares that reach to the national average industry, so a value above 1× means the requirement is more pervasive here than across the economy as a whole.

Nationally, about 1.2% of workers are in occupations that significantly rely on Philosophy and Theology (measured across 32 industries).

Sectors with the most such workers

Sector Workers Employment reach
Educational Services 1,165,290 8.5%
Health Care and Social Assistance 382,870 1.7%
Other Services (except Public Administration) 85,810 1.9%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 14,780 0.6%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 14,510 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 7,680 0.3%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 6,860 0.1%
Finance and Insurance 5,100 0.1%
Information 3,530 0.1%
Retail Trade 410 0.0%
Wholesale Trade 290 0.0%
Manufacturing 270 0.0%

Industries where it is most concentrated

Industry Level Concentration Employment reach
Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians) National industry 13.92× 16.7%
Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers National industry 9.75× 11.7%
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities National industry 8.08× 9.7%
Educational Services Sector 7.08× 8.5%
Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities National industry 4.92× 5.9%
Other Services (except Public Administration) Sector 1.58× 1.9%
Health Care and Social Assistance Sector 1.42× 1.7%
Offices of Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapists, and Audiologists National industry 1.33× 1.6%
Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities National industry 0.67× 0.8%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Sector 0.5× 0.6%
Management of Companies and Enterprises Sector 0.25× 0.3%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Sector 0.08× 0.1%

Reach is a measure of how widespread a requirement is across an industry's workforce, not how intensively any individual uses it. Sector worker counts come from BLS OEWS employment; the significance threshold and tool use come from O*NET. Industries shown by concentration are filtered to a real worker base so a tiny specialty cannot top the list on rounding.

Capabilities required by many of the same occupations — a measure of which skills, knowledge and abilities tend to travel together, not a judgment of similarity.

Capability Type Shared occupations
History and Archeology Knowledge 15
Sociology and Anthropology Knowledge 24
Fine Arts Knowledge 7
Foreign Language Knowledge 4
Geography Knowledge 9
Communications and Media Knowledge 14
Psychology Knowledge 19
Memorization Ability 7
Therapy and Counseling Knowledge 8
Learning Strategies Basic skill 25
Instructing Cross-functional skill 26
Originality Ability 25

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Philosophy and Theology." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; Census NAICS 2022; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27). Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/knowledge/philosophy-and-theology

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Philosophy and Theology. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/knowledge/philosophy-and-theology

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-philosophy-and-theology,
  title  = {Philosophy and Theology},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; Census NAICS 2022; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27). Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/knowledge/philosophy-and-theology}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.